What are the initial investigations for a 19-year-old male (YOM) with frequent food getting stuck in the upper esophagus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Investigations for Food Impaction in Upper Esophagus in a 19-Year-Old Male

Upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) with biopsies should be the initial investigation for a 19-year-old male with frequent food stuck in the upper esophagus, as it provides both diagnostic and therapeutic benefits while allowing evaluation for underlying conditions. 1

Diagnostic Approach

First-Line Investigation:

  1. Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
    • Provides direct visualization of the esophageal mucosa
    • Allows for immediate therapeutic intervention
    • Enables biopsy collection to diagnose underlying conditions
    • Should include multiple biopsies (3-4 from proximal and 3-4 from distal esophagus) 1
    • Patient should be off proton pump inhibitors for 2-4 weeks prior to biopsy to avoid masking findings 1

Timing of Endoscopy:

  • Urgent endoscopy (<24 hours) is recommended for persistent esophageal foreign bodies without complete obstruction 1
  • Emergent endoscopy (within 2-6 hours) would be needed if there were signs of complete obstruction 1

Radiographic Studies (if indicated):

  • Plain radiographs (neck, chest) may be considered but have limited utility with food impaction (false-negative rates up to 85%) 1
  • CT scan should be performed only if perforation or other complications are suspected 1
  • Avoid contrast studies (barium/gastrografin) as they may:
    • Increase aspiration risk
    • Coat the foreign body and mucosa, impairing endoscopic visualization
    • Delay definitive intervention 1

Diagnostic Considerations

High-Suspicion Conditions in Young Adults:

  1. Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

    • Most likely diagnosis in this age group
    • Particularly common in young males with atopic history 2
    • Endoscopic findings may include:
      • Edema
      • Rings
      • Exudates
      • Furrows
      • Strictures
      • Can appear normal in some cases 1
    • Diagnostic hallmark: >20 eosinophils per high-power field 2
  2. Esophageal Rings/Webs

    • May be congenital or acquired
    • Often located in upper esophagus 3
    • Can cause intermittent dysphagia, especially with solid foods
  3. Esophageal Strictures

    • May be subtle and only evident during endoscopy 4
    • Can result from various conditions including reflux or eosinophilic esophagitis

Other Considerations:

  • Post-COVID dysmotility/achalasia (if recent COVID infection) 1
  • Medication-induced injury (e.g., doxycycline) 1
  • Candidal esophagitis (if recent antibiotics or immunosuppression) 1

Important Clinical Pearls

  1. Underlying disorders are common

    • Up to 25% of patients with food impaction have an underlying esophageal disorder 1
    • Diagnostic work-up for potential underlying disease is strongly recommended 1
  2. Endoscopic technique considerations

    • Upper esophageal lesions may be missed during standard endoscopy 3
    • Special attention should be paid to the cricopharyngeal area and upper esophagus during withdrawal 3
    • Mucosal furrows are easily overlooked but are an important diagnostic clue for EoE 4
  3. Avoid these pitfalls:

    • Relying solely on radiographs for diagnosis (high false-negative rate)
    • Performing contrast studies that may delay definitive management
    • Failing to obtain biopsies during endoscopy, even if mucosa appears normal
    • Missing subtle endoscopic findings of EoE (furrows, rings, white plaques)
    • Overlooking the upper esophagus during endoscopic examination
  4. Delayed management risks:

    • Prolonged impaction increases risk of perforation 5
    • Longer duration of impaction is associated with higher complication rates 5

By following this approach, the underlying cause of recurrent food impaction can be identified and appropriately treated, reducing the risk of future episodes and complications.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Eosinophilic esophagitis: asthma of the esophagus?

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2004

Research

Endoscopic examination of the upper esophagus by withdrawal of endoscope over guide wire.

Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.