Treatment of Schwannoma
The treatment of schwannoma should be determined by tumor size, location, symptoms, and patient factors, with observation (wait and scan) being the recommended first-line approach for small, asymptomatic tumors, while surgical resection is indicated for large tumors with brainstem compression. 1, 2
Treatment Algorithm Based on Tumor Size and Symptoms
Small Asymptomatic Tumors (Koos grades I-II)
Observation (Wait and Scan) is the management of choice
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to observation
Surgery is NOT recommended for small asymptomatic tumors
- Risk of functional deterioration up to 50%
- Evidence class III, recommendation level C 1
Small Tumors with Complete Hearing Loss (Koos grades I-II)
- All treatment options can be justified
- Observation is usually first option (evidence class III, recommendation level C)
- SRS carries lower risk profile than surgery (evidence class II, recommendation level B) 1
- Surgery may be considered if cure is the primary goal
Medium-Sized Tumors (Koos grades III-IV, <3 cm)
- Treatment should be performed due to symptomatic burden
- Surgery or radiosurgery can be recommended at similar levels (recommendation level C)
- SRS has lower risk profile than surgery
- Subtotal resection to preserve function may be an option if subsequent SRS can be provided 1
Large Tumors with Brainstem Compression (Koos grade IV, >3 cm)
- Surgical resection is the only option
- Primary goal is decompression of brainstem and stretched cranial nerves
- Should be performed at high-volume centers
- Recommendation level: good practice point 1, 2
Follow-up Protocol
- For conservatively treated, radiated, or incompletely resected tumors:
- Annual MRI and audiometry for 5 years
- Doubled intervals thereafter if stable
- For completely resected tumors:
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
Tumor growth detection: Volumetric measurements are more accurate than bidimensional measurements; significant growth is defined as ≥50% volume increase 6
Quality of life impact: QoL cannot be predicted based on management strategy alone; poor QoL is more likely in patients with large, symptomatic tumors that were resected 1
Multidisciplinary approach: Patients should be discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards, especially for medium-sized tumors 1, 2
Surgical expertise matters: If surgery is indicated, treatment at a high-volume center is recommended since surgical experience affects outcome 1
Supportive care: Should focus on clinical symptoms and treatment complications, including management of facial nerve palsy and hearing loss 1
Monitoring pitfalls: Even after 5 years of stability, 7.2% of tumors may exhibit growth, necessitating continued surveillance 1
Non-vestibular schwannomas: For schwannomas in other locations (e.g., radial nerve), complete surgical removal with nerve preservation is the treatment of choice 7