Management of Vasovagal Syncope
Patient education on the diagnosis and prognosis of vasovagal syncope is the cornerstone of management, followed by physical counter-pressure maneuvers and pharmacological interventions like midodrine when necessary. 1
First-Line Interventions
Patient Education
- Explain the benign nature of the condition and its generally favorable prognosis
- Identify and avoid specific triggers (emotional stress, pain, medical procedures, prolonged standing)
- Recognize prodromal symptoms (diaphoresis, warmth, pallor) to prevent episodes
- Instruct patients to assume a supine position when prodromal symptoms occur
Non-Pharmacological Approaches
Physical Counter-Pressure Maneuvers (Class IIa, Level B-R)
- Highly effective for patients with sufficiently long prodromal periods
- Techniques include leg crossing, limb/abdominal contraction, and squatting
- These maneuvers have been shown to be superior to conventional therapy alone 1
Volume Expansion (Class IIb, Level C-LD)
- Increased salt intake (unless contraindicated)
- Maintain fluid intake of 2-2.5 liters per day
- Particularly useful in posture-related syncope 1
Lifestyle Modifications
Orthostatic Training (Class IIb, Level B-R)
- Standing quietly against a wall for 30-60 minutes daily
- Note: RCTs have not shown sustained benefit in reducing syncope recurrence 1
Second-Line Interventions (Pharmacological)
When non-pharmacological methods are unsuccessful, consider medications:
Midodrine (Class IIa, Level B-R)
- First-line pharmacological therapy
- Reasonable in patients with recurrent VVS
- Contraindicated in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or urinary retention
- Meta-analysis showed 43% reduction in syncope recurrence 1
Fludrocortisone (Class IIb, Level B-R)
- Consider for patients with inadequate response to salt and fluid intake
- Typical dose: 0.1 to 0.2 mg per day
- Monitor serum potassium due to risk of hypokalemia
- POST II trial showed marginally insignificant 31% risk reduction 1
Beta Blockers (Class IIb, Level B-NR)
- Might be reasonable in patients ≥42 years of age with recurrent VVS
- Note: May aggravate bradycardia in cardioinhibitory cases
- Evidence for efficacy is inconsistent 1
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (Class IIb, Level C-LD)
- Consider in patients with recurrent VVS unresponsive to other therapies 1
Special Considerations
Medication Adjustment
- Reduce or withdraw medications that cause hypotension when appropriate (Class IIb, Level C-LD) 1
- Diuretics and vasodilators are common culprits 1
High-Risk Settings
- Patients in high-risk settings (e.g., commercial drivers, machine operators) require special consideration for treatment 1
- More aggressive management may be warranted to prevent injury
Situational Syncope
- For specific types (micturition, defecation, cough, laugh, swallow syncope)
- Focus on avoidance or elimination of triggering events
- Increase fluid/salt consumption and reduce hypotensive medications where appropriate 1
Treatment Algorithm
- Start with patient education and lifestyle modifications
- Implement physical counter-pressure maneuvers if prodrome is present
- If syncope persists, add volume expansion strategies
- For continued symptoms, consider pharmacological therapy:
- First choice: Midodrine (if no contraindications)
- Second choice: Fludrocortisone (if inadequate response to salt/fluid)
- Third choice: Beta blockers (if patient ≥42 years) or SSRIs
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Overtreatment: Treatment is not necessary in patients who have experienced only a single syncope episode and are not in high-risk settings 1
- Underestimating non-pharmacological approaches: These should form the foundation of treatment before moving to medications 2
- Inappropriate use of beta blockers: These may worsen bradycardia in cardioinhibitory cases 1
- Neglecting medication review: Failing to identify and modify hypotensive medications that may contribute to symptoms 1
By following this structured approach to management, most patients with vasovagal syncope can achieve significant reduction in syncope burden and improvement in quality of life 3.