What is the Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) procedure used for?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Procedure

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) is primarily used for the surgical management of lung cancer and other thoracic conditions, offering significantly less postoperative pain than open surgery while providing similar long-term results. 1

Primary Indications for VATS

VATS is indicated for:

  • Lung cancer resection:

    • Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly clinical stage I with no lymph node metastasis 2
    • Lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resections 3
    • Diagnostic procedures before proceeding with standard resection to detect unsuspected causes of irresectability 1
  • Mediastinal staging:

    • Accessing mediastinal lymph nodes for biopsy and staging 1
    • Systematic lymph node dissection during lung resection 1, 3
  • Other thoracic conditions:

    • Management of pleural infections 3
    • Pleural and mediastinal biopsies 4
    • Treatment of pneumothorax 4
    • Pleurectomy 4

Advantages Over Traditional Thoracotomy

VATS offers several significant benefits:

  • Reduced mortality: 35/1000 vs 47/1000 patients with traditional thoracotomy 3
  • Fewer complications: 152/1000 vs 197/1000 patients 3
  • Shorter hospital stays: Median 4-5 days vs 6 days for open procedures 1, 3
  • Less postoperative pain: Significantly reduced compared to thoracotomy 1, 3
  • Shorter chest tube duration: Median 3 days vs 4 days 3
  • Fewer blood transfusions: 2% vs 5% with traditional thoracotomy 3

Patient Selection Considerations

VATS is particularly beneficial for:

  • Elderly patients: The less invasive nature makes it particularly suitable for older patients 1
  • Patients with comorbidities: Lower complication rates (28% vs 45%) compared to open procedures 1
  • Early-stage lung cancer patients: Particularly those without extensive pleural adhesions 3
  • Patients with good pulmonary function: Ideal candidates for uniportal VATS 3
  • Patients without previous thoracic surgery: Better outcomes in this population 3

Technical Aspects

When performing VATS:

  • Oncological principles must be followed:

    • Individual division of vessels and bronchus of the target lobe
    • Systematic lymph node dissection
    • Minimal manipulation of lymph nodes to prevent capsule rupture 3, 2
  • Surgical approaches:

    • Conventional multiport VATS (multiple small incisions)
    • Uniportal VATS (single incision) - safe and effective alternative with potentially less pain 3, 5

Clinical Outcomes

VATS has demonstrated:

  • Equivalent oncological outcomes to open thoracotomy 6
  • Lower perioperative morbidity compared to open procedures 1, 4
  • Very low complication and mortality rates making VATS procedures considered safe and effective 4
  • Particular benefit for elderly patients with significantly lower rate of complications (28% versus 45%) 1

Potential Complications

The most common complications include:

  • Prolonged air leak
  • Bleeding
  • Infection
  • Postoperative pain
  • Port site recurrence
  • Need for conversion to thoracotomy 4

Important Considerations

  • Referral to high-volume centers is recommended for elderly patients as outcomes are associated with surgical expertise 1
  • Pneumonectomy should be avoided in elderly patients due to higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality 1
  • Multimodal pain management approach is recommended, including regional analgesia followed by systemic analgesia 3

VATS has evolved from being primarily a diagnostic tool in the 1990s to becoming the standard approach for many thoracic procedures, with expanding indications to include more advanced and complex operations 7, 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy.

Journal of chest surgery, 2021

Guideline

Thoracic Surgery Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Peri-operative complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

International journal of surgery (London, England), 2008

Research

Updates on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Current treatment options in oncology, 2019

Research

Modern impact of video assisted thoracic surgery.

Journal of thoracic disease, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.