What are the red flags on an electrocardiogram (ECG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Red Flags on Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

ST-segment elevation with reciprocal changes is the most concerning ECG finding, as it has a 94% positive predictive value for acute myocardial infarction and requires immediate intervention. 1

Primary Life-Threatening ECG Findings

ST-Segment Abnormalities

  • ST-segment elevation ≥1mm in 2+ contiguous leads

    • Most concerning when accompanied by reciprocal ST depression in anatomically opposite leads 1
    • Indicates transmural myocardial injury/infarction
    • Requires immediate reperfusion therapy evaluation
    • False positives can occur with:
      • Left ventricular hypertrophy
      • Left bundle branch block
      • Pericarditis
      • Early repolarization pattern
  • ST-segment depression ≥0.5mm in 2+ contiguous leads 2

    • May indicate subendocardial ischemia
    • Particularly concerning when horizontal or downsloping

T-Wave Abnormalities

  • Deep T-wave inversions ≥1mm in 2+ contiguous leads 2
    • Especially concerning in anterior (V2-V4) or lateral (I, aVL, V5-V6) leads
    • May indicate ischemia, cardiomyopathy, or pulmonary embolism
    • Note: T-wave inversions in V1-V3 may be normal in black athletes and adolescents <16 years 2

Conduction Abnormalities

  • Complete left bundle branch block (new onset)

    • QRS ≥120ms with predominantly negative QRS in V1 and upright notched/slurred R wave in leads I and V6 2
    • May mask underlying STEMI
    • New LBBB with appropriate clinical context should be treated as STEMI equivalent
  • Profound intraventricular conduction delay

    • QRS duration ≥140ms 2
    • May indicate severe conduction system disease

Arrhythmias

  • Ventricular tachyarrhythmias

    • Couplets, triplets, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia 2
    • Indicate electrical instability
  • Profound bradycardia

    • Heart rate <30 beats/min or sinus pauses ≥3 seconds 2
    • May lead to hemodynamic compromise
  • High-grade AV blocks

    • Mobitz Type II second-degree AV block
    • Third-degree (complete) heart block 2
    • May require urgent pacing

Other Critical ECG Findings

Q-Wave Abnormalities

  • Pathological Q waves
    • Q/R ratio ≥0.25 or duration ≥40ms in 2+ contiguous leads (excluding III and aVR) 2
    • In anterior MI, associated with larger infarct size, higher prevalence of heart failure, and increased mortality 3
    • Q-wave regression over time is associated with improved left ventricular function 4

QT Interval Abnormalities

  • Prolonged QT interval

    • QTc ≥470ms (male), ≥480ms (female), or ≥500ms (marked prolongation) 2
    • Risk for torsades de pointes and sudden cardiac death
    • May be congenital or acquired (medications, electrolyte abnormalities)
  • Short QT interval

    • QTc <340ms
    • Associated with risk of sudden cardiac death

Brugada Pattern

  • Type 1 Brugada pattern
    • Coved ST-segment elevation ≥2mm with downsloping ST-segment followed by negative T-wave in ≥1 lead in V1-V3 2
    • Associated with risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death

Pre-excitation

  • Ventricular pre-excitation (WPW pattern)
    • PR interval <120ms with delta wave and wide QRS (≥120ms) 2
    • Risk of rapid conduction of atrial arrhythmias

Electrolyte and Metabolic Abnormalities

  • Hyperkalemia

    • Tall, peaked T waves
    • Widened QRS complex
    • Flattened or absent P waves
    • Sine wave pattern in severe cases
    • Can mimic STEMI 2
  • Hypokalemia

    • U-wave prominence
    • ST-segment depression
    • T-wave flattening
  • Hypercalcemia

    • Shortened QT interval
  • Hypocalcemia

    • Prolonged QT interval

Clinical Context Considerations

Pitfalls in ECG Interpretation

  • False positives for ischemia 2:

    • Early repolarization (especially in young athletes)
    • Left ventricular hypertrophy
    • Bundle branch blocks
    • Pericarditis/myopericarditis
    • Brugada syndrome
    • J-point elevation syndromes
    • Ventricular pre-excitation
    • Cardiomyopathies
    • Metabolic disturbances
    • Certain medications (tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines)
  • False negatives for ischemia 2:

    • Prior MI with Q-waves and/or persistent ST elevation
    • Right ventricular pacing
    • LBBB
    • Lateral wall MI (may be "electrically silent") 5

Important Clinical Applications

  • All ECGs should be interpreted by a qualified physician, not solely by computer algorithms 2, 6
  • Serial ECGs are essential for evolving conditions like acute MI 2
  • Compare with previous ECGs when available 2
  • ECG findings must always be interpreted in clinical context 6

Algorithmic Approach to ECG Red Flags

  1. Assess for immediate life threats:

    • ST-segment elevation with reciprocal changes
    • New LBBB
    • Ventricular tachyarrhythmias
    • High-grade AV blocks
  2. Evaluate for ischemic changes:

    • ST-segment deviations
    • T-wave inversions
    • Pathological Q waves
  3. Check for conduction abnormalities:

    • Bundle branch blocks
    • Fascicular blocks
    • AV blocks
  4. Assess for arrhythmias:

    • Bradyarrhythmias
    • Tachyarrhythmias
    • Irregular rhythms
  5. Look for electrolyte/metabolic disturbances:

    • QT interval abnormalities
    • T-wave morphology changes
    • U-wave prominence

By systematically evaluating these key areas, clinicians can identify critical ECG findings that require immediate attention and intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.