The Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer
The main role of lowering testosterone with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer is to suppress tumor growth and progression by reducing testosterone to castrate levels (<50 ng/dL), as prostate cancer cells are dependent on androgens for their survival and proliferation. 1
Mechanism of Action
ADT works through several key mechanisms:
Prevents activation of androgen receptors in target cells through either:
- Reduction in testosterone production (via LHRH agonists/antagonists or surgical castration)
- Blockade of androgen receptors (via antiandrogens) 2
LHRH agonists (like leuprolide) initially cause a surge in LH and FSH, followed by downregulation of receptors, leading to decreased testosterone production 3
LHRH antagonists directly block receptors without the initial surge 4
The resulting castrate levels of testosterone (typically <50 ng/dL) lead to:
Clinical Applications
ADT serves as:
Gold standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer 1
- Delays progression of disease
- Provides symptomatic relief
- Extends survival in metastatic settings
Adjuvant therapy with radiation for high-risk localized or locally advanced disease 1
- ADT before, during, and after radiation therapy has been shown to prolong survival in selected patients
Treatment for biochemical recurrence (rising PSA after definitive treatment) 1
- May delay appearance of symptoms and metastases
- Timing remains controversial and should be based on PSA velocity and doubling time
Treatment Options
The primary ADT approaches include:
Surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy)
- Rapid testosterone reduction
- Permanent effect
- Lower risk of fractures and cardiovascular complications compared to LHRH agonists 1
Medical castration
- LHRH agonists (leuprolide, goserelin)
- LHRH antagonists
- Both are equally effective as surgical castration 1
Combined androgen blockade (CAB)
- Addition of antiandrogens to castration therapy
- Provides modest to no benefit over castration alone in metastatic disease 1
Monitoring and Effectiveness
- Adequate suppression of serum testosterone to <50 ng/dL is essential 1
- PSA levels should be monitored to assess treatment response
- Imaging may be required to evaluate disease progression
Considerations and Limitations
Side effects include:
Resistance development:
Intermittent vs. continuous ADT:
- Intermittent ADT may provide similar survival outcomes with improved quality of life 1
- Close monitoring required during off-treatment periods
Common Pitfalls
Inadequate testosterone suppression:
- Failure to achieve castrate levels (<50 ng/dL) may adversely impact survival 7
- Regular monitoring of testosterone levels is essential
Overuse in low-risk disease:
- ADT has not shown survival benefit in early-stage, low-risk disease 1
- Unnecessary exposure to side effects should be avoided
Ignoring cardiovascular risk:
- Cardiovascular risk assessment before initiating ADT is crucial
- Risk appears highest in elderly patients with recent cardiovascular events 6
Neglecting bone health:
- ADT increases risk of osteoporosis and fractures
- Bone health monitoring and preventive measures should be implemented
In summary, ADT remains a cornerstone of prostate cancer treatment by effectively lowering testosterone levels to inhibit cancer growth and progression. However, its use must be carefully balanced against potential side effects, with appropriate monitoring and management strategies in place.