Is a chest CT angiography indicated for PE in a patient with bilateral DVTs and no SOB?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CT Angiography Is Not Indicated for PE Evaluation in a 67-Year-Old Patient with Bilateral DVTs Who Denies Shortness of Breath

In a 67-year-old patient with known bilateral DVTs who denies shortness of breath, CT pulmonary angiography is not indicated to look for pulmonary embolism (PE).

Rationale for Not Performing CTPA

Clinical Presentation Assessment

  • According to the British Thoracic Society guidelines, most patients with PE are breathless and/or tachypneic (>20/min); in the absence of these symptoms, PE is less likely 1
  • The absence of shortness of breath is particularly significant, as dyspnea is present in 82-85% of patients with confirmed PE 1
  • Clinical probability assessment is a crucial first step in PE evaluation, and the absence of respiratory symptoms significantly lowers clinical probability

Risk-Benefit Analysis

  • CTPA exposes patients to:
    • Ionizing radiation
    • Intravenous contrast with potential for contrast-induced nephropathy
    • Unnecessary healthcare costs
  • In a patient with already diagnosed bilateral DVTs, the treatment plan (anticoagulation) would likely remain the same regardless of PE diagnosis

Diagnostic Algorithm for PE Suspicion

  1. Clinical Probability Assessment:

    • The patient has a major risk factor (bilateral DVTs) but lacks key PE symptoms
    • This places them in an intermediate clinical probability category 1
  2. Management Approach:

    • For patients with diagnosed DVT, anticoagulation is already indicated
    • The absence of respiratory symptoms suggests stable condition without massive PE
    • Current guidelines support treating the DVT without additional imaging for PE in asymptomatic patients
  3. When CTPA Would Be Indicated:

    • Development of shortness of breath
    • Tachypnea (respiratory rate >20/min)
    • Chest pain (particularly pleuritic)
    • Hemoptysis
    • Signs of hemodynamic instability

Alternative Approaches

  • If there are concerns about PE despite the absence of shortness of breath:
    • Monitor for development of respiratory symptoms
    • Consider clinical assessment tools (Wells score, Geneva score)
    • Assess vital signs for tachycardia, tachypnea, or hypoxemia

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Overutilization of CTPA:

    • Studies show CTPA confirms PE in only 14.9-38% of suspected cases 2, 3
    • Indiscriminate use results in unnecessary radiation and contrast exposure 4
  2. Ignoring Clinical Presentation:

    • The absence of shortness of breath significantly reduces PE likelihood
    • The British Thoracic Society specifically notes that in the absence of breathlessness/tachypnea, other symptoms like pleuritic chest pain are usually due to another cause 1
  3. Redundant Testing:

    • In a patient with confirmed bilateral DVTs already requiring anticoagulation, PE diagnosis would rarely change management unless massive PE is suspected

In conclusion, for this 67-year-old patient with known bilateral DVTs who denies shortness of breath, the best approach is to treat the DVTs with appropriate anticoagulation and monitor for development of respiratory symptoms, rather than proceeding directly to CTPA.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The Positive Rate of Pulmonary Embolism by CT Pulmonary Angiography Is High in an Emergency Department, Even in Low-Risk or Young Patients.

Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.