What is the recommended initial imaging study for a patient's hip following a fall?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Imaging Recommendation for Hip Following a Fall

Radiography is the recommended initial imaging modality for evaluating a patient's hip following a fall, consisting of an anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis with approximately 15 degrees of internal rotation and a cross-table lateral view of the affected hip. 1, 2

Rationale for Initial Radiographic Imaging

  • Radiographs are rapidly obtained, well-tolerated by patients, and detect approximately 90% of proximal femoral fractures 1, 2
  • Standard orthogonal views provide complementary information:
    • AP view of the pelvis allows visualization of both hips for comparison
    • Cross-table lateral view provides an orthogonal perspective critical for complete evaluation 2
  • When a fracture is clearly demonstrated on radiographs, frequently no additional imaging is needed for treatment planning 1

Complete Radiographic Assessment

  • The complete initial radiographic assessment should include:
    1. AP view of the pelvis
    2. AP view of the symptomatic hip (sometimes included)
    3. Cross-table lateral view of the affected hip 2

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not omit the cross-table lateral view even when the AP view shows a fracture, as the lateral view can change treatment decisions in some cases 1, 2
  • Do not exclude the pelvis from initial imaging, as associated pelvic fractures are common in patients with suspected proximal femur fractures 1, 2
  • Be aware that patients with hip fractures may present with vague symptoms (pain in buttocks, knees, thighs, groin, or back) rather than typical hip pain 3
  • Displaced fractures typically present with external rotation, abduction, and shortening of the affected leg 4

When Radiographs Are Negative but Clinical Suspicion Remains

If initial radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion for fracture remains high:

  1. MRI without contrast is the recommended next imaging study with 99-100% sensitivity for detecting occult hip fractures 1, 2, 5
  2. CT scan is an alternative when MRI is contraindicated or unavailable, though it is less sensitive than MRI 1, 2

High-Risk Scenarios Requiring Advanced Imaging

Advanced imaging should be strongly considered when radiographs are negative in:

  • Patients aged 80 years or older (44% occult fracture rate) 5
  • Cases with equivocal radiographic reports (58% occult fracture rate) 5
  • Patients with a clear history of trauma (41% occult fracture rate) 5
  • Patients unable to bear weight on the affected extremity 3

Clinical Importance

Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical because:

  • Delays in diagnosis and treatment are associated with increased complications, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality rates 1
  • Early detection of occult fractures allows for appropriate treatment planning and can prevent rapid decline in quality of life 3
  • Even seemingly isolated greater trochanter fractures may have intertrochanteric extension when evaluated with advanced imaging 1

Remember that approximately 32% of elderly patients with hip/pelvic pain after low-energy trauma who have negative initial radiographs will later be diagnosed with a fracture on advanced imaging 6, highlighting the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pelvic Radiography Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Hip fractures in adults.

American family physician, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.