Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) Study: A Prognostic Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
The Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) is an excellent prognostic tool in symptomatic women, with a low DTS being associated with an annual mortality rate of ≈0.25% in contrast to an annual mortality rate of ≈5% in those with a high-risk DTS, with lower mortality rates among women than men. 1
What is the Duke Treadmill Score?
The DTS is a validated risk stratification tool that integrates multiple parameters from an exercise treadmill test (ETT) to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. The formula is:
DTS = Exercise time − (5 × ST-segment deviation) − (4 × angina score index)
Where:
- Exercise time is measured in minutes on the standard Bruce protocol
- ST-segment deviation is the greatest net ST-segment deviation in any lead (except aVR)
- Angina score index: 0 = no angina, 1 = non-limiting angina, 2 = exercise-limiting angina
Risk Stratification Categories
The DTS categorizes patients into three risk groups:
- Low risk: DTS ≥5
- Moderate risk: DTS -10 to 4
- High risk: DTS ≤-11
Clinical Significance and Recommendations
Diagnostic Value
- In symptomatic women referred for ETT followed by coronary angiography, significant coronary stenosis (≥75%) was present in:
- 19% of low-risk women
- 35% of moderate-risk women
- 89% of high-risk women 1
Prognostic Value
- Low DTS: Associated with an annual mortality rate of approximately 0.25%
- High-risk DTS: Associated with an annual mortality rate of approximately 5% 1
- The DTS is a valuable tool for predicting the risk of future myocardial infarction
Management Algorithm Based on DTS
Low-risk DTS (≥5):
- Low annual mortality rate (≈0.25%)
- Generally can be managed conservatively
Moderate-risk DTS (-10 to 4):
- Should be referred for additional risk stratification with stress imaging study 1
- Consider further evaluation with stress echocardiography or myocardial perfusion imaging
High-risk DTS (≤-11):
- High annual mortality rate (≈5%)
- Consider direct referral for coronary angiography
Gender Differences
- The DTS has diagnostic and prognostic value in both women and men 1
- Women generally have lower mortality rates than men within the same DTS category
- The DTS may be less effective at predicting prognosis in elderly women (aged ≥75 years) 1
Important Considerations
- The quoted mortality rates are derived from earlier patient cohorts; contemporary cohorts would likely have lower high-risk mortality rates 1
- Exercise capacity (measured in METs or time) is one of the strongest predictors of outcomes for women 1
- Women who achieve <5 METs are at increased risk of death and related IHD events, independent of traditional cardiac risk factors 1
Limitations and Pitfalls
- Exertional chest pain symptoms were less accurate for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in women 1
- The DTS should be interpreted alongside other important prognostic variables from the ETT, including:
- Exercise capacity
- Chronotropic response
- Heart rate recovery
- Blood pressure response 1
Conclusion
The DTS provides valuable risk stratification that goes beyond the ST-segment response alone. It should be calculated and reported for all exercise treadmill tests to guide clinical decision-making regarding the need for additional testing or interventions based on cardiovascular risk.