What is the stent failure rate of Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Drug-Eluting Stent Failure Rates

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have a stent thrombosis rate of approximately 0.5-1.0% within the first month after implantation, with an additional 0.2% per year risk between years 1-4 compared to bare-metal stents. 1

Stent Thrombosis Rates by Timeframe

Early Stent Thrombosis (≤30 days)

  • Subacute stent thrombosis: 0.5-1.0% 1
  • Early stent thrombosis (within 30 days): 0.44% for DES vs 0.5% for BMS (p=0.74) 1

Late Stent Thrombosis (>30 days to 1 year)

  • Late stent thrombosis (1-12 months): 0.19% in DES registry 1
  • Overall late stent thrombosis (>30 days): 0.5% for DES vs 0.28% for BMS (p=0.22) 1

Very Late Stent Thrombosis (>1 year)

  • Very late stent thrombosis (>1 year): 0.5% for DES vs 0% for BMS (relative risk 5.02) 1
  • Ongoing risk of approximately 0.2% per year between years 1-4 after DES implantation 1

Overall Stent Failure Rates

  • In-stent restenosis: 3-20% depending on patient and lesion characteristics 2
  • Overall stent thrombosis (by any criterion): approximately 3% for both DES and BMS over 4 years of follow-up 1
  • Target lesion revascularization (TLR): 4.7-7.2% at 9 months for DES vs 11.3-22.9% for BMS 1

Clinical Impact of Stent Thrombosis

  • Stent thrombosis is a significant clinical event with high morbidity and mortality
  • Death or MI occurs in 64.4% of patients with documented BMS thrombosis 1
  • Mortality rates due to presumed or documented DES thrombosis range from 20-45% 1

Risk Factors for Stent Thrombosis

Clinical Risk Factors

  • Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy (HR: 90, p<0.001) 1
  • Renal failure (HR: 6.49, p<0.001) 1
  • Diabetes mellitus (HR: 3.71, p=0.001) 1
  • Lower ejection fraction (HR: 1.09 for each 10% decrease, p<0.001) 1
  • Advanced age 1
  • Acute coronary syndrome 1
  • Prior brachytherapy 1

Angiographic Risk Factors

  • Bifurcation lesions (HR: 6.42, p<0.001) 1
  • Long stents 1
  • Multiple lesions 1
  • Overlapping stents 1
  • Ostial or bifurcation lesions 1
  • Small vessels 1
  • Suboptimal stent results (underexpansion, malaposition, or residual dissection) 1

DES vs BMS Comparison

  • DES significantly reduce target lesion revascularization compared to BMS (4.7-7.2% vs 11.3-22.9%) 1
  • DES show particular benefit in high-risk scenarios:
    • Long lesions (>23mm) 3
    • Small vessels 1
    • Diabetes 1, 4
    • Left main disease 1, 5
    • In-stent restenosis 1
    • Bifurcations 1
    • Multiple lesions 1
    • Saphenous vein grafts 1

Important Clinical Considerations

  • The greatest risk for DES thrombosis is early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 1
  • DES should not be used when there are:
    • Financial barriers to continuing prolonged DAPT
    • Social barriers limiting patient compliance
    • Medical issues involving bleeding risks
    • Need for invasive or surgical procedures within a year that would interrupt antiplatelet therapy 1
  • Median time to late sirolimus-eluting stent thrombosis: 15.5 months (range 173-773 days) 1
  • Median time to paclitaxel-eluting stent thrombosis: 18 months (range 40-548 days) 1

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Recommendations

  • Current guidelines recommend DAPT for at least 12 months after DES implantation 1
  • Continuation beyond 1 year may be considered based on individual risk/benefit assessment 1
  • Premature discontinuation of DAPT markedly increases the risk of catastrophic stent thrombosis and death or MI 1

The failure rate of DES must be considered in the context of both stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. While DES have significantly reduced restenosis rates compared to BMS, the risk of stent thrombosis remains an important concern, particularly when DAPT is discontinued prematurely.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.