Treatment of Food Bolus Obstruction in the Throat
Urgent endoscopic intervention is the recommended first-line treatment for persistent food bolus obstruction in the throat, with the procedure performed on the next available endoscopy list or as an immediate emergency depending on clinical presentation. 1
Initial Assessment and Management
- Airway assessment: Ensure airway is not compromised
- Clinical evaluation: Assess for signs of perforation (severe pain, fever, subcutaneous emphysema)
- Timing of intervention:
Endoscopic Management
Preferred Approach
- Flexible endoscopy is first-line approach 1
- Success rates up to 90% with appropriate technique
- Allows for diagnostic evaluation of underlying conditions
Removal Techniques (in order of preference)
- Push technique: Gentle pushing of the bolus into the stomach with air insufflation 1
- Retrieval techniques: Using baskets, snares, or grasping forceps if push technique fails 1
- Balloon catheter method: Passing a balloon catheter (ERCP stone extraction catheter) past the food bolus, inflating it, and withdrawing to disimpact the bolus 1
Special Considerations
- Anesthesia: Monitored anesthesia care with conscious sedation is recommended 2
- General anesthesia with intubation may be needed for complete obstruction
- Anesthesiologist should be informed about potential EoE diagnosis
- Rigid endoscopy: Consider as second-line approach if flexible endoscopy fails or if the bolus is located in the upper esophagus 1
Diagnostic Workup During Procedure
- Obtain biopsies: Take at least 6 esophageal biopsies from different anatomical sites during index endoscopy 1
- Essential for diagnosing underlying conditions like eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)
- EoE is the most common cause of food bolus obstruction (found in up to 46% of cases) 1
- Assess for strictures: If stricture is identified with signs of EoE, immediate dilation may be performed 1
Ineffective Interventions
- Pharmacological agents: No evidence supports the use of medications like buscopan, baclofen, salbutamol, or benzodiazepines 1, 3
- A study showed no significant difference in resolution rates between patients who received buscopan (68%) and those who did not (63%) 3
- Effervescent agents: No evidence supports their effectiveness 4
- "Watch and wait" approach: Not recommended for persistent obstruction; no evidence that medical intervention is more effective than observation alone for spontaneous disimpaction 4
Post-Procedure Management
- Outpatient follow-up: Arrange elective endoscopy and outpatient review if:
- Food bolus obstruction spontaneously resolves
- Sufficient diagnostic biopsies were not obtained during initial endoscopy 1
- PPI withdrawal: If EoE is suspected but initial biopsies are negative, withhold PPI for at least 3 weeks and repeat endoscopy 1
- Maintenance therapy: If EoE is diagnosed, initiate topical steroid treatment to reduce risk of recurrent food bolus obstruction 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failure to obtain biopsies: Disimpaction of food bolus alone without biopsies leads to significant loss of follow-up and failure to diagnose underlying causes 1
- Delayed intervention: Surgical intervention should occur within 24 hours to prevent complications 4
- Missing underlying conditions: Up to 25% of patients have underlying disorders (stricture, hiatus hernia, esophageal web, Schatzki ring, EoE, achalasia, tumors) 1
- Lack of follow-up: Failure to follow up and initiate appropriate maintenance therapy leads to recurrent episodes 1
Food bolus obstruction requires prompt endoscopic management with appropriate diagnostic workup to identify and treat underlying conditions, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, which is the most common cause of this presentation.