What is the COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) exacerbation severity classification for this patient based on the Rome proposed criteria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

COPD Exacerbation Severity Classification Based on Rome Criteria

Based on the Rome proposed criteria, this 81-year-old female patient's COPD exacerbation is classified as severe due to her resting oxygen saturation of 88%, respiratory rate of 28 breaths/min, and dyspnea VAS score of 8. 1, 2, 3

Rome Criteria for COPD Exacerbation Severity

The Rome classification system uses objective, readily measurable parameters to categorize COPD exacerbations into three severity levels:

Mild Exacerbation

  • Respiratory rate <20 breaths/min
  • Heart rate <90 beats/min
  • Oxygen saturation ≥93%
  • No abnormal arterial blood gas
  • Dyspnea VAS <5

Moderate Exacerbation

  • Respiratory rate 20-30 breaths/min
  • Heart rate 90-110 beats/min
  • Oxygen saturation 90-92%
  • Abnormal arterial blood gas (but not severe)
  • Dyspnea VAS 5-7

Severe Exacerbation

  • Respiratory rate >30 breaths/min
  • Heart rate >110 beats/min
  • Oxygen saturation <90%
  • Severe abnormal arterial blood gas
  • Dyspnea VAS >7

Analysis of Patient's Clinical Parameters

Looking at our patient's vital signs and symptoms:

  • Respiratory rate: 28 breaths/min (moderate range)
  • Heart rate: 99 beats/min (moderate range)
  • Oxygen saturation: 88% (severe range)
  • Arterial blood gas: normal (mild range)
  • Dyspnea VAS: 8 (severe range)

Since the patient has two parameters in the severe range (oxygen saturation <90% and dyspnea VAS >7), her exacerbation is classified as severe according to the Rome criteria 1, 3.

Clinical Implications

The Rome severity classification has been validated in multiple studies and correlates with important clinical outcomes:

  • Patients classified as having severe exacerbations have higher rates of:
    • ICU admission (14.9% vs 6.4% for mild) 3
    • Need for mechanical ventilation (45.3% vs 11.7% for mild) 3
    • In-hospital mortality (13.9% vs 3.8% for mild) 1
    • 12-month mortality (53.2% vs 27% for mild) 4

Management Considerations

Given this severe classification:

  • Hospital admission is indicated rather than outpatient management 5
  • Close monitoring for respiratory failure is necessary
  • Treatment should include:
    • Controlled oxygen therapy targeting saturation of 88-92%
    • Short-acting bronchodilators (albuterol and possibly ipratropium)
    • Systemic corticosteroids
    • Antibiotics (given the green sputum suggesting bacterial infection)
    • Consider non-invasive ventilation if respiratory status worsens 5

Important Caveats

  1. The traditional GOLD classification system simply categorizes exacerbations as:

    • Mild (treated with short-acting bronchodilators only)
    • Moderate (treated with short-acting bronchodilators plus antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids)
    • Severe (requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit) 5
  2. The Rome criteria provide a more objective assessment that can identify heterogeneity even among hospitalized patients, with studies showing that approximately 14-42% of hospitalized COPD exacerbations are actually "mild" by Rome criteria 1, 3

  3. This patient's history of two exacerbations within the past year (one requiring hospitalization) indicates she is at high risk for poor outcomes, regardless of the current exacerbation severity 5, 6

The Rome classification helps standardize the assessment of COPD exacerbations using objective criteria, allowing for more appropriate resource allocation and treatment intensity based on true severity rather than just the treatment setting.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.