Cardiac Risk Assessment for a 68-Year-Old Patient with CAD Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy
The patient has low cardiac risk for hemorrhoidectomy under general anesthesia due to the non-stenotic nature of the coronary lesion (40% stenosis) and the low-risk nature of the surgical procedure.
Risk Stratification Based on Patient and Surgical Factors
Patient-Specific Risk Factors:
- 68-year-old patient (age is a risk factor)
- History of coronary artery disease with prior stents
- Current 40% stenosis in OM1 (obtuse marginal branch)
Procedure-Related Risk:
- Hemorrhoidectomy is considered a low-risk procedure
- General anesthesia adds minimal additional risk compared to the procedure itself
Analysis of Cardiac Risk
Coronary Anatomy Assessment:
- 40% stenosis is considered non-obstructive coronary disease
- According to CAD-RADS classification, this would be classified as CAD-RADS 2 (25-49% stenosis), indicating mild non-obstructive coronary artery disease 1
- Non-obstructive stenoses (<50%) generally do not cause significant hemodynamic compromise during surgery
Procedural Risk Assessment:
- Hemorrhoidectomy is classified as a low-risk procedure with cardiac complication rates generally <1% 1
- The 2024 AHA/ACC guidelines indicate that patients with stable coronary disease undergoing low-risk procedures have minimal increased perioperative risk 1
Specific Risk Calculation
The patient's risk can be estimated using established risk calculators:
Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) factors present:
- Coronary artery disease: +1 point
- Age >65: +1 point
- Total: 2 points, which corresponds to approximately 1-2% risk of major adverse cardiac events
Important considerations:
- The patient's coronary lesion is non-obstructive (40% stenosis)
- Prior stents appear to be patent (no mention of in-stent stenosis)
- No mention of heart failure, diabetes, renal dysfunction, or cerebrovascular disease that would increase risk
Management Recommendations
Preoperative testing:
- No additional stress testing is indicated given the non-obstructive nature of the coronary lesion and low-risk procedure 1
- Routine ECG is reasonable given the patient's age and cardiac history
Medication management:
- Continue aspirin perioperatively if patient is on it
- If patient is on dual antiplatelet therapy for recent stent placement, timing of surgery may need adjustment based on stent type and placement date 2
- Continue statins and beta-blockers if the patient is on them
Anesthetic considerations:
- General anesthesia is appropriate with standard monitoring
- Consider arterial line if hemodynamic instability is anticipated
- Maintain hemodynamic stability to avoid tachycardia or hypotension
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Overestimating risk:
Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy:
- If the patient has had recent stent placement, premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy can lead to stent thrombosis 2
- Coordinate with cardiology if surgery timing can be adjusted to minimize this risk
Underestimating bleeding risk:
- Hemorrhoidectomy can be associated with postoperative bleeding
- Balance antiplatelet/anticoagulant management carefully
In summary, this 68-year-old patient with prior coronary stents and current 40% stenosis in OM1 has a low cardiac risk (approximately 1-2%) for hemorrhoidectomy under general anesthesia. The procedure can proceed with standard perioperative cardiac management and monitoring.