Management of Sick Sinus Syndrome
Permanent pacemaker implantation is the definitive treatment for symptomatic sick sinus syndrome, with dual-chamber rate-adaptive pacing (DDDR) preferred over single-chamber pacing. 1
Diagnosis and Initial Assessment
Diagnostic criteria:
- Electrocardiographic evidence of sinus node dysfunction (bradycardia, sinus pauses, sinoatrial block)
- Correlation between symptoms and bradyarrhythmias
- Extended monitoring often required (24-hour Holter, event monitoring, implantable loop recorder) 1
Common presentations:
- Syncope or near-syncope (occurs in ~50% of patients)
- Dizziness, fatigue, palpitations
- Tachy-brady syndrome (alternating bradycardia and tachycardia) in at least 50% of patients 2
Acute Management of Symptomatic Bradycardia
For hemodynamically unstable patients:
- Initiate temporary cardiac pacing promptly 1
- Pharmacologic therapy as bridge to pacing:
Caution: Atropine may cause paradoxical block or sinus arrest in heart transplant patients 3
For stable patients with symptoms:
- Discontinue or adjust bradycardia-inducing medications
- Consider permanent pacing evaluation
Definitive Management
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Class I indications for permanent pacing:
- Symptomatic bradycardia with documented correlation between symptoms and bradyarrhythmia 1
- Symptomatic chronotropic incompetence
- Symptomatic sinus bradycardia resulting from essential medications
Pacing mode selection:
Avoid: Single-chamber ventricular pacing (VVI/VVIR) in SSS patients 1
- Increases risk of pacemaker syndrome and atrial fibrillation
Medication Management
Review and adjust current medications:
- Discontinue or reduce doses of bradycardia-inducing medications when possible:
- Beta-blockers
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
- Antiarrhythmic drugs 1
- Discontinue or reduce doses of bradycardia-inducing medications when possible:
Anticoagulation:
- Consider in patients with SSS and atrial fibrillation due to increased thromboembolic risk (15.2% in unpaced SSS patients vs 1.3% in controls) 1
- Follow standard atrial fibrillation anticoagulation guidelines
Theophylline:
- May be considered in select patients who are not candidates for pacing
- Can improve heart rate but less effective than pacemaker for preventing syncope 5
- Limited evidence for long-term use
Special Considerations
Tachy-brady syndrome:
- Requires management of both bradycardia and tachyarrhythmias
- Pacemaker implantation may allow more aggressive antiarrhythmic therapy
- Dual-chamber pacing helps preserve optimal atrioventricular coupling 6
Heart failure prevention:
- Both pacemaker therapy and theophylline associated with lower incidence of heart failure compared to no treatment 5
Post-pacemaker follow-up:
- Regular device checks to ensure proper function
- Continued monitoring for development of atrial fibrillation
- Adjustment of pacing parameters as needed
Prognosis
- Permanent pacing improves symptoms and quality of life 2
- Reduces incidence of syncope and heart failure 5
- Dual-chamber pacing associated with lower incidence of atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events, and heart failure compared to ventricular pacing 7
- No significant difference in mortality between AAIR and DDDR pacing 4