Evidence for Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion
Intra-arterial thrombolysis is a reasonable treatment option for patients with basilar artery occlusion, particularly those with severe clinical deficits, though mechanical thrombectomy is now preferred when available. 1
Current Treatment Approach for Basilar Occlusion
First-Line Treatment: Mechanical Thrombectomy
- Endovascular thrombectomy is now the preferred treatment for basilar artery occlusion, especially in patients with:
Role of Thrombolysis
Intravenous tPA:
Intra-arterial thrombolysis:
Evidence for Thrombolysis in Basilar Occlusion
Observational Studies
A large multicenter observational cohort study showed that intra-arterial thrombolysis was associated with:
- Better results than antithrombotic therapy among patients with severe clinical deficits
- Poorer outcomes than antithrombotic therapy in patients with mild to moderate baseline deficits 1
Recanalization rates with IV tPA alone for basilar artery occlusion are approximately 30% 1
Combined approaches using IV abciximab and intra-arterial tPA have shown:
- High recanalization rates (85%) in basilar occlusion
- However, functional outcomes remained poor (15% favorable outcome), likely due to late treatment initiation 2
Prognostic Factors
- Variables affecting outcomes in basilar occlusion thrombolysis include:
- Recanalization status (mortality 46% with recanalization vs. 92% without) 3
- Length of basilar artery obstruction 3
- Patient age 3
- Collateral circulation 3
- Etiology (embolic occlusions respond better to thrombolysis than atherothrombotic) 3
- Pretreatment Glasgow Coma Scale score (higher scores associated with better outcomes) 4
Practical Considerations
Treatment Algorithm
- Confirm basilar occlusion with CT/MR angiography
- If within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and no contraindications, administer IV tPA
- Prepare for endovascular thrombectomy regardless of IV tPA eligibility
- For patients ineligible for both IV tPA and thrombectomy, consider intra-arterial thrombolysis if:
- Within 6 hours of symptom onset
- At an experienced stroke center with immediate access to cerebral angiography and qualified interventionalists
Safety Considerations
- Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurs in approximately 10% of patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis 1
- The availability of intra-arterial thrombolysis should not preclude the administration of IV tPA in eligible patients 1
Emerging Approaches
- Combined approaches using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (like abciximab) with intra-arterial thrombolysis show promising results for basilar occlusion 5
- Mechanical thrombectomy following IV-rtPA administration has shown successful reperfusion in all patients in one small study, with good outcomes (mRS 0-2) in 45% of patients 4
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying treatment initiation significantly worsens outcomes in basilar occlusion
- Failing to consider mechanical thrombectomy as the first-line treatment when available
- Withholding IV tPA in eligible patients when endovascular treatment is planned
- Not recognizing that basilar occlusion patients may benefit from treatment at longer time windows than anterior circulation strokes