What are the 5 specific genes examined in the Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Microsatellite Instability PCR Test: The 5 Genes Examined

The MSI PCR test examines five specific microsatellite markers: BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27, which is the recommended panel due to its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to older panels. 1

Standard MSI PCR Panels

There are two primary panels used in MSI PCR testing:

  1. Current Recommended Panel (Pentaplex Mononucleotide Panel):

    • BAT-25
    • BAT-26
    • NR-21
    • NR-24
    • NR-27
  2. Original NCI/Bethesda Panel:

    • BAT-25 (mononucleotide)
    • BAT-26 (mononucleotide)
    • D5S346 (dinucleotide)
    • D2S123 (dinucleotide)
    • D17S250 (dinucleotide)

Why the Pentaplex Mononucleotide Panel is Superior

The five poly-A mononucleotide repeat panel has become the current standard because:

  • It demonstrates higher specificity and sensitivity in MSI testing 1
  • It may obviate the need for normal tissue for comparison 1, 2
  • It provides more consistent results across different populations 2

In a comprehensive multipopulation analysis of 1,206 individuals from 55 different populations worldwide, the pentaplex panel showed remarkable consistency, with 87.5% of individuals showing no variant alleles 2.

Clinical Application and Interpretation

MSI is defined as loss of stability in 2 or more of the 5 microsatellite markers 1. This testing is particularly important for:

  • Identifying Lynch syndrome and other hereditary cancer syndromes
  • Determining prognosis in colorectal and other cancers
  • Guiding immunotherapy decisions

A simplified 3-marker assay (BAT-25, BAT-26, and D2S123) has been proposed by some researchers as potentially more accurate for identifying patients with favorable prognosis 3, but the 5-marker panel remains the standard recommendation in clinical guidelines.

Complementary Testing

While MSI PCR is highly sensitive (99.3% in gastric cancers), it is often used in conjunction with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) 4. The consensus panel from ESMO recommends using both MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR to assess eligibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer and other cancers of the Lynch syndrome spectrum 1.

Important Considerations

  • MSI-low tumors should be included with microsatellite stable tumors, as they have similar clinical behavior 1
  • In cases of discordant or indeterminate results between MSI PCR and IHC, complementary testing is required 4
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents an alternative molecular test to assess MSI and has the advantage of simultaneously determining tumor mutational burden 1

MSI testing has significant implications for patient outcomes, as MSI-high tumors generally have more favorable prognosis and may respond differently to certain chemotherapy regimens 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Multipopulation analysis of polymorphisms in five mononucleotide repeats used to determine the microsatellite instability status of human tumors.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006

Research

Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.