CT Abdomen and Pelvis with Enhancement: Indications and Recommendations
Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis should be performed for suspected acute pathology requiring detailed visualization of organ parenchyma, vascular structures, and inflammatory processes, while non-contrast CT is preferred for suspected urolithiasis or in patients with contraindications to contrast.
Primary Indications for Enhanced CT Abdomen/Pelvis
Acute Abdominal/Pelvic Conditions
- Suspected complicated infections: Pyelonephritis, tubo-ovarian abscess, diverticulitis 1
- Poorly localized abdominal/pelvic pain with broad differential diagnosis 1
- Equivocal or non-diagnostic ultrasound findings requiring further evaluation 1
- Suspected malignancy requiring assessment of enhancement patterns, invasion, or metastasis 1
Specific Clinical Scenarios
Gynecologic Conditions
- Vulvar cancer recurrence: Contrast-enhanced CT is usually appropriate for detecting lymph node metastases (sensitivity 60%, specificity 90%) 1
- Pelvic inflammatory disease: Contrast enhancement helps identify subtle findings before gross anatomical changes occur 1
- Ovarian masses: Contrast helps characterize solid components and vascularity 1
Urologic Conditions
- Acute pyelonephritis (complicated): Contrast-enhanced CT has superior detection rate (84.4%) compared to ultrasound (40%) 1, 2
- Renal abscess: Better detected with contrast enhancement (missed in 4.6% of cases with non-contrast CT) 1
When Non-Enhanced CT is Preferred
- Suspected urolithiasis: Non-contrast CT is the gold standard (sensitivity 97%) 1, 2
- Contraindications to IV contrast: Severe allergy or eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m² 2
- Acute hemorrhage: Non-contrast CT can effectively detect and localize active bleeding 3
Optimal Technical Parameters
- Contrast type: Non-ionic iodinated contrast media 2
- Volume: 100-150 mL (standard adult dose) 2
- Timing: Portal venous phase (approximately 70 seconds post-injection) 2
- Flow rate: 3.0 mL/s provides optimal enhancement of both arterial and venous structures 4
Clinical Impact of Contrast Enhancement
- Administration of IV contrast significantly improves detection of urgent pathology compared to non-contrast CT (p=0.004) 5
- Repeat CT within 72 hours is often unnecessary if the initial CT was performed with IV contrast 5
- Adherence to ACR appropriateness criteria for IV contrast administration increases detection of urgent pathology (p=0.02) 5
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
- Contrast timing errors: Scanning too early results in suboptimal venous enhancement; excessive delay reduces vessel opacification 2
- Renal function assessment: Always check eGFR before administering contrast 2
- Contrast reaction history: Critical to avoid overlooking contraindications 2
- Oral contrast: Generally not required for routine venous phase imaging but may be considered when bowel delineation is specifically needed 2
In patients with suspected acute abdominal pathology, contrast-enhanced CT significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and may prevent unnecessary repeat imaging, making it the preferred approach when not contraindicated.