In abdominal injuries, what is the most informative initial investigation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Informative Initial Investigation in Abdominal Trauma

Ultrasound (FAST - Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) is the most informative initial investigation in abdominal injuries. 1

Rationale for FAST as Initial Investigation

  • FAST is rapid and non-invasive, allowing for immediate assessment during the primary survey without delaying resuscitation efforts 1
  • High specificity (96-100%) and accuracy (92-99%) for detecting hemoperitoneum 1
  • Can be performed in the resuscitation area while other stabilization measures are ongoing 1
  • Helps guide immediate decision-making, particularly for hemodynamically unstable patients 1, 2

Diagnostic Performance of FAST

  • Sensitivity: 74-76% for detecting intraperitoneal free fluid 1, 3
  • Specificity: 84-96% 1, 3
  • Accuracy: 79-99% 1, 3
  • Negative FAST can reliably rule out significant hemoperitoneum (>500ml) 1

Limitations of FAST

  • Limited sensitivity for specific organ injuries 1
  • Up to 29% of abdominal injuries may be missed if FAST is used as the sole diagnostic tool 4
  • Less reliable for detecting low-grade solid organ injuries 3

Comparison with Other Modalities

CT Scan

  • Superior for detailed assessment but inappropriate as initial investigation for unstable patients 1
  • Recommended as secondary investigation for:
    • Hemodynamically stable patients with positive FAST
    • Patients with negative FAST but concerning mechanism or exam
    • Characterization of specific organ injuries 1, 2
  • Time-consuming and requires patient transport from resuscitation area 1

Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL)

  • Invasive procedure with potential complications 1
  • Largely replaced by FAST in modern trauma protocols 1
  • Only indicated when ultrasound is unavailable or results are equivocal in unstable patients 2

X-Ray

  • Limited sensitivity for abdominal injuries 1
  • Cannot reliably detect free fluid or solid organ injuries 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Perform FAST as initial investigation for all patients with suspected abdominal trauma
  2. If FAST is positive + patient is hemodynamically unstable → immediate surgery
  3. If FAST is positive + patient is hemodynamically stable → proceed to CT scan
  4. If FAST is negative but high clinical suspicion remains → proceed to CT scan in stable patients
  5. Consider risk factors associated with abdominal injury despite negative FAST:
    • Abrasions/contusions in lower chest or upper abdomen
    • Pulmonary contusion
    • Lower rib fractures
    • Hemo/pneumothorax
    • Hematuria
    • Pelvic or thoracolumbar spine fractures 4

The answer is C. US (Ultrasound).

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.