Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT) is the Best Test for Screening Vaginal Herpes
The optimal test for screening vaginal herpes is nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT)/PCR, which has superior sensitivity and specificity compared to other available methods and should be the first-line diagnostic test for suspected genital herpes infections. 1
Diagnostic Options for Vaginal Herpes
NAAT/PCR (First-line)
- Most FDA-approved tests have >90% sensitivity and specificity 1
- Significantly higher detection rates than viral culture (24-57% more sensitive) 2, 3
- Can detect and differentiate between HSV-1 and HSV-2 in a single test 1
- Results available within 2-4 hours 3
- Requires less strict sample transportation conditions compared to culture 1
- Particularly valuable for lesions that are healing, ulcerative, or crusting 2
Viral Culture (Second-line)
- Traditional "gold standard" but being replaced by NAAT/PCR 4
- Lower sensitivity than NAAT (70% for ulcerative lesions, dropping to 27% for crusting lesions) 1
- Advantages include demonstrating active infection and allowing antiviral sensitivity testing 1
- Results typically take 24-72 hours but may take up to 5 days 1, 5
- Significantly affected by sample transportation conditions and timing 1
Direct Immunofluorescence Assay and Tzanck Smear
- Lack sensitivity and are not recommended 1
Type-Specific Serologic Testing
- Only appropriate when no active lesions are present 4
- Not recommended for initial diagnosis when lesions are present 1
- HSV-1 assays lack sensitivity (around 70%) 1
- HSV-2 serologic tests lack specificity (as low as 57%) 1
Proper Specimen Collection for Vaginal Herpes
For optimal results when testing for vaginal herpes:
- Insert a vaginal speculum moistened with warm water
- Clean the cervical canal opening with a sterile gauze swab
- For cervical lesions: Insert a cotton-wool or Dacron swab into the cervical canal (2 cm depth) and collect material from lesions
- For vaginal lesions: Insert a swab through the hymen and collect material from the back wall of the vagina
- For vesicular lesions:
- Open vesicles with a sterile needle
- Collect vesicle content with a swab
- Place in appropriate transport media for NAAT/PCR 1
Important Clinical Considerations
- Timing matters: Sample collection should occur as early as possible in the course of lesion development, as sensitivity decreases as lesions heal 1
- False negatives can occur with healing lesions 1
- NAAT should not be performed in the absence of genital ulcers/lesions due to intermittent viral shedding 1
- Always use assays that differentiate between HSV-1 and HSV-2 to provide patients with information about expected natural history 1
- For patients without active lesions but suspected herpes, type-specific serologic testing is appropriate 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on clinical diagnosis without laboratory confirmation (can lead to both false positive and false negative diagnoses) 1
- Using NAAT/PCR in the absence of visible lesions (not sensitive due to intermittent viral shedding) 1
- Delayed transport of samples for viral culture (significantly reduces sensitivity) 1
- Using non-type-specific tests that cannot differentiate between HSV-1 and HSV-2 1
- Overreliance on serologic testing when lesions are present (NAAT is more appropriate) 1
By following these evidence-based recommendations, clinicians can accurately diagnose vaginal herpes, allowing for appropriate treatment, counseling, and prevention strategies to reduce morbidity and improve quality of life.