What is a normal QTc (corrected QT interval) range?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal QTc Interval Range

The normal QTc interval is ≤450 ms for men and ≤460 ms for women, with values ≤390 ms considered abnormally short for both genders. 1, 2

QTc Normal Ranges by Gender and Age

  • Adult Men: ≤450 ms is normal, 451-480 ms is borderline prolonged, >480 ms is prolonged 1, 2
  • Adult Women: ≤460 ms is normal, 461-480 ms is borderline prolonged, >480 ms is prolonged 1, 2
  • Children under 12 years: ≤450 ms is considered normal 2
  • Adolescents (12-16 years): Gender differences begin to emerge, with values similar to adults 1

High-Risk QTc Values

  • QTc >500 ms: Considered high-risk for both men and women, with significantly increased risk of torsades de pointes (TdP) and sudden cardiac death 2, 3
  • QTc >500 ms (unexplained): Indicative of unequivocal Long QT Syndrome (LQTS), regardless of family history and symptoms 1
  • For every 10 ms increase in QTc: Approximately 5% increase in the risk of arrhythmic events 3

QTc Calculation Methods

The method used to calculate QTc significantly impacts the measured values:

  • Bazett's formula (QTc = QT/√RR): Most commonly used but has significant limitations:

    • Leaves a strong positive residual correlation with heart rate
    • Produces artificially prolonged QTc values at higher heart rates
    • Results in wider distribution of QTc values 2, 4
  • Preferred methods:

    • Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT/∛RR): Performs better than Bazett's, especially at heart rates >85 bpm 2, 5
    • Linear regression formulas: Recommended by AHA/ACC as they better adjust for heart rate 2

Special Considerations

  • QRS prolongation: In ventricular conduction defects, QT interval naturally prolongs and requires adjustment:

    • Consider using JT interval (QT duration–QRS duration) with appropriate normal standards 1, 2
  • Serial ECG comparisons:

    • Use the same recording system and standardized procedures
    • Ideally have the same reader interpret sequential tracings
    • FDA guidelines recommend reporting increases of >30 ms and >60 ms from baseline when evaluating drug effects 1, 2
  • Measurement technique:

    • Measure in leads with T-wave amplitude of at least 2 mm (typically leads II, V3, or V5)
    • Measure from beginning of QRS complex to end of T wave
    • Use the longest value (return to baseline) 1, 2
    • Avoid leads with U waves 2

Common Pitfalls

  • Using Bazett's formula at extreme heart rates: Can produce false QT prolongations, especially at heart rates >100 bpm or <60 bpm 1, 2, 4
  • Attempting rate correction with high RR variability: Not recommended in conditions like atrial fibrillation 2
  • Inconsistent lead selection: Using different leads for serial measurements introduces variability 2
  • Ignoring gender differences: Using the same cutoff for men and women can lead to misclassification 1, 2
  • Overlooking age-related differences: The gender difference in QTc intervals becomes smaller after age 40 and nearly disappears in older adults 2

Remember that QTc prolongation >500 ms significantly increases the risk of torsades de pointes and sudden cardiac death, requiring prompt evaluation and management, especially when considering QT-prolonging medications 3, 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Electrocardiogram Interpretation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Managing drug-induced QT prolongation in clinical practice.

Postgraduate medical journal, 2021

Research

QT Corrections for Long QT Risk Assessment: Implications for the Preparticipation Examination.

Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.