Initial Approach to Syncope
The initial approach to a patient presenting with syncope should include a comprehensive cardiac evaluation with continuous ECG monitoring, especially for patients with high-risk features such as syncope while sitting without prodrome, abnormal ECG findings, history of structural heart disease, or age >60 years. 1
Initial Evaluation
The initial evaluation should focus on three key components:
Detailed History
- Circumstances surrounding the event (position, activity, prodromal symptoms)
- Duration of loss of consciousness
- Recovery pattern (confusion, nausea, pallor)
- Witness accounts
- Previous episodes
- Family history of sudden cardiac death
- Medication review
Physical Examination
- Vital signs including orthostatic measurements
- Cardiovascular examination (murmurs, irregular rhythm)
- Neurological assessment
- Carotid sinus massage in selected patients >40 years (if no contraindications)
12-lead ECG
- Look for conduction abnormalities, arrhythmias, QT prolongation, Brugada pattern, pre-excitation, or evidence of structural heart disease
This initial evaluation can diagnose up to 50% of syncope cases and allows for immediate risk stratification 1, 2.
Risk Stratification
High-risk features requiring urgent evaluation:
- Syncope during exertion or while supine
- Absence of prodromal symptoms
- Family history of sudden cardiac death
- Abnormal ECG findings
- History of structural heart disease or heart failure
- Age >60 years
- Palpitations preceding syncope
Patients with these features should be considered for hospital admission for further evaluation 1.
Diagnostic Testing
Based on initial evaluation, select appropriate diagnostic tests:
For all hospitalized patients with suspected cardiac etiology:
- Continuous ECG monitoring (Class I recommendation) 1
For suspected structural heart disease:
- Echocardiogram (Class IIa recommendation) 1
For suspected arrhythmic etiology:
- Extended cardiac monitoring (24-48 hour Holter or 30-day event monitor)
- Electrophysiological study (EPS) in selected patients (Class IIa recommendation) 1
For suspected vasovagal syncope:
- Tilt-table testing if orthostatic testing is negative (Class IIa recommendation) 1
For syncope during exertion:
- Exercise stress testing (Class IIa recommendation) 1
Tests to Avoid Without Specific Indications
- MRI/CT of head
- Carotid artery imaging
- Routine EEG
These tests have a Class III: No Benefit recommendation 1.
Classification and Management Approach
1. Cardiac Syncope (15-20%)
- Highest mortality risk (18-33% at 1 year)
- Requires specialist referral and specific treatment based on etiology
- May require cardiac device placement or ablation
2. Reflex (Neurally Mediated) Syncope (75%)
- Most common type, especially in younger patients
- Management includes:
- Trigger avoidance
- Physical counter-pressure maneuvers
- Adequate hydration
- In severe cases, pharmacotherapy
3. Orthostatic Hypotension
- Defined as >20 mmHg drop in systolic BP or >20 bpm increase in heart rate within 3 minutes of standing
- Management includes:
- Medication review and adjustment
- Volume expansion
- Compression stockings
- Pharmacotherapy in severe cases
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Dismissing cardiac causes when initial ECG is normal - Intermittent arrhythmias may require extended monitoring 1
Assuming orthostatic hypotension is ruled out by a single negative test - Delayed orthostatic hypotension may take >3 minutes to develop 1
Focusing on neurological causes before excluding cardiac etiologies - Cardiac causes are more life-threatening and should be ruled out first 1
Failing to recognize presyncope - Patients with presyncope have similar prognoses to those with syncope and should undergo similar evaluation 2
Overuse of neuroimaging - Low diagnostic yield unless specific neurological symptoms are present 1
Follow-up
- Schedule follow-up within 2-4 weeks for first episode
- Earlier follow-up for recurrent episodes
- Provide patient education on trigger avoidance and when to seek immediate medical attention 1
The structured approach to syncope evaluation using risk stratification reduces hospital admissions, lowers medical costs, and increases diagnostic accuracy 2, 3.