Treatment for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended as first-line treatment for great saphenous vein insufficiency, particularly for vein diameters >4.5mm, due to its high success rates and favorable safety profile. 1
Diagnostic Evaluation
- Confirm diagnosis with duplex ultrasound evaluation of:
- Deep venous system
- Great saphenous vein (GSV)
- Small saphenous vein (SSV)
- Accessory saphenous veins
- Document presence, location, and duration of reflux (abnormal reflux defined as retrograde venous flow >500 ms) 1
Treatment Algorithm
First-line Treatments
Endovenous Thermal Ablation
Compression Therapy
Alternative Treatments
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS)
Surgical Options
- High ligation and stripping (HL+S) - traditional surgical approach
- Shows comparable long-term outcomes to thermal ablation 2
- Consider when endovenous treatments are contraindicated or failed
Newer Techniques
- Mechanochemical ablation (MOCA)
- Cyanoacrylate glue
- Endovenous steam ablation 2
Treatment Selection Based on Vein Diameter
- Veins >7.2mm: Total abolishment of saphenous reflux recommended due to correlation with severe disease and poor prognosis 4
- Veins 4.5-7.2mm: RFA or EVLA preferred 1
- Veins <4.5mm: Consider sclerotherapy 1
Combined Approaches
- Combined EVLA and foam sclerotherapy shows high occlusion rates (93% primary closure) with infrequent complications 5
- Consider adjunctive phlebectomy for tributary varicosities to improve quality of life outcomes 6
Follow-up Care
- Ultrasound follow-up within 1-2 weeks to confirm successful vein closure and rule out deep venous thrombosis 1
- Continue compression therapy with 20-30 mmHg graduated compression stockings for at least 2 years 1
- Monitor for potential complications:
- Paresthesia
- Thrombophlebitis
- Nerve damage
- DVT risk (0.3-0.7%)
- Thrombus extension into the common femoral vein 1
Lifestyle Modifications
- Elevation of the affected leg
- Avoidance of prolonged standing and straining
- Regular exercise to activate calf muscle pumps
- Wearing non-restrictive clothing
- Decreased sodium intake
- Weight loss
- Skin care with emollients 1
Treatment Efficacy Considerations
- RFA and EVLA show similar technical success rates up to 5 years 2
- RFA may have better long-term outcomes compared to EVLA or HL/S after 5 years 2
- Standalone ablation of anterior accessory great saphenous veins without treating associated tributaries may result in suboptimal quality of life outcomes 6
The treatment approach should be guided by vein diameter, patient factors, and availability of expertise, with thermal ablation (particularly RFA) being the preferred first-line treatment for most patients with great saphenous vein insufficiency.