How can radiology errors be minimized?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Minimizing Radiology Errors: A Comprehensive Approach

To minimize radiology errors effectively, healthcare facilities must implement robust quality assurance programs that include proper equipment maintenance, comprehensive staff training, standardized protocols, and systematic peer review processes. 1

Equipment and Facility Management

Modern Equipment and Calibration

  • Radiological equipment should generate diagnostic-quality images at minimal radiation dose
  • Outdated equipment that requires higher-than-standard radiation doses should be replaced or renovated 1
  • Regular collaboration between facility directors, equipment service engineers, and radiological physicists is essential to ensure optimal equipment calibration 1
  • Equipment should provide user control of imaging parameters to balance image quality and dose 1

Facility Quality Oversight

  • Facility directors should monitor overall radiological performance by:
    • Tracking patient procedure doses
    • Monitoring personnel doses
    • Investigating outlier exposures
    • Taking corrective action when indicated 1

Personnel Training and Culture

Comprehensive Training

  • All clinical personnel must receive proper training in:
    • Radiation physics
    • Radiation biology
    • Radiation protection protocols 1
  • Training should foster a culture of respect for radiation hazards and patient safety 1
  • Both horizontal interventions (improving culture and environment) and vertical interventions (addressing specific error areas) are needed for comprehensive safety 2

Safety Culture Development

  • Implement a "just culture" approach where errors are viewed as learning opportunities rather than opportunities for blame 3
  • Establish operational rounds with radiology leadership to reinforce safety practices 2
  • Develop safety coach programs to provide ongoing guidance 2
  • Create lessons-learned communication programs to share insights from errors 2

Protocol Optimization

Radiation Dose Minimization

  • Select protocols that deliver the least radiation exposure while still answering the clinical question 1
  • Administer the smallest radiopharmaceutical activities likely to ensure diagnostic image quality 1
  • Limit examinations to the specific body region of interest 1
  • For nuclear imaging, use stress-first imaging for patients with reasonable pretest probability of normal studies 1

Standardized Processes

  • Establish standardized protocols to reduce variability and error potential 4
  • Implement process improvement initiatives to continuously refine workflows 4
  • Create a quality scorecard that posts relevant data for each operational group within the department 5

Quality Assurance Framework

Comprehensive QA Program

  • Address four main quality areas: safety, process improvement, professional outcome assessment, and satisfaction 5
  • Establish a quality oversight committee to coordinate these areas 5
  • Implement regular peer review processes such as ACR's RADPEER™ to assess diagnostic accuracy 1
  • Ensure proper ergonomic conditions and monitor characteristics to reduce fatigue and repetitive stress injuries 1

Teleradiology Considerations

  • Teleradiologists must maintain appropriate professional qualifications including proper licensure, medical staff privileges, board certification, and malpractice insurance 1
  • Teleradiology providers should participate in established quality assurance programs including formal peer review 1
  • Ensure appropriate ergonomic conditions and monitor specifications for teleradiologists 1

Continuous Improvement

Performance Monitoring

  • Implement continuous programs to monitor performance metrics 4
  • Analyze and depict data to identify trends and areas for improvement 4
  • Establish mechanisms for implementing change based on findings 4
  • Meet regulatory requirements through systematic documentation 4

Value-Based Approach

  • Quantify radiology's impact on patient outcomes to demonstrate value 1
  • Focus on higher levels of the Fryback and Thornbury hierarchical value model (patient outcome, therapeutic impact) rather than just technical efficacy 1
  • Prioritize patient and referring clinician experiences to enhance outcomes 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Collecting excessive data that obscures original quality assurance aims 6
  • Implementing expensive tests that are not cost-effective 6
  • Failing to adapt the quality assurance program to changing departmental needs 6
  • Focusing solely on technical aspects while neglecting the clinical impact of radiology services 1

By implementing these comprehensive strategies, radiology departments can significantly reduce errors, improve patient safety, and enhance the value of radiological services in healthcare delivery.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Improving patient safety in radiology.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2010

Research

Creating a Radiology Quality and Safety Program: Principles and Pitfalls.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2018

Research

Strategies for establishing a comprehensive quality and performance improvement program in a radiology department.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2009

Research

Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2009

Research

Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology--for its own sake or that of the patient.

Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care, 1990

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.