What is the gold standard diagnostic test for Achilles tendinopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Gold Standard Diagnostic Test for Achilles Tendinopathy

MRI is the gold standard diagnostic test for Achilles tendinopathy with 95% sensitivity and specificity for tendon tears, degeneration, and chronic tendinopathy. 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

First-Line Assessment

  1. Clinical Examination - Should include at least two of the following tests:

    • Thompson/Simonds squeeze test
    • Assessment of decreased ankle plantar flexion strength
    • Palpation for gap or defect in tendon (sensitivity 84%, specificity 73%)
    • Evaluation of increased passive ankle dorsiflexion
    • Pain localization 2-6 cm above calcaneal insertion (sensitivity 78%, specificity 77%) 2, 1, 3
  2. Plain Radiography

    • To rule out associated bony abnormalities or avulsion fractures
    • Not specifically diagnostic for tendinopathy itself 1

Advanced Imaging

  1. MRI (Gold Standard)

    • Highest sensitivity and specificity (95%) for tendon pathology
    • Can detect tendinosis, partial tears, and complete ruptures
    • Provides detailed assessment of tendon structure and surrounding tissues
    • Superior to ultrasound for comprehensive evaluation 1, 4
  2. Ultrasound

    • Good alternative with high specificity (94%) but lower sensitivity (58%)
    • Operator-dependent results
    • Benefits:
      • Lower cost than MRI
      • Dynamic assessment capability
      • Can differentiate full-thickness from partial-thickness tears with 92% accuracy
      • 100% sensitivity and 90% accuracy for some tendon tears
    • Limitations:
      • Results highly dependent on operator skill and expertise 2, 1, 5

Comparative Diagnostic Value

MRI Advantages

  • Provides comprehensive evaluation of tendon structure
  • Detects associated pathologies that may mimic tendinopathy
  • Not operator-dependent
  • In chronic Achilles tendinopathy, MRI detected 26 of 27 cases (96%) of tendinosis and partial rupture 2

Ultrasound Advantages

  • More accessible and cost-effective
  • Allows dynamic assessment
  • Can guide interventional procedures
  • In chronic Achilles tendinopathy, ultrasound detected 21 of 26 cases (81%) 2

Important Considerations

  • Clinical examination remains essential and should always precede imaging 1, 3
  • The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is unable to recommend for or against the routine use of MRI and ultrasonography to confirm diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture due to insufficient evidence 2
  • Despite this, current practice guidelines from multiple sources identify MRI as the most accurate imaging modality 1, 4
  • Ultrasound shows high agreement with MRI (median 89%, κ = 0.74) when performed by trained operators 5

Potential Pitfalls

  • Over-reliance on imaging without proper clinical correlation
  • MRI findings may exist in asymptomatic individuals
  • Ultrasound results vary significantly based on operator experience
  • Delayed diagnosis may lead to chronic tendinopathy and poorer outcomes
  • Misdiagnosis of partial tears as complete ruptures or vice versa can lead to inappropriate treatment

When diagnostic uncertainty exists after clinical examination, MRI provides the most comprehensive and accurate assessment of Achilles tendon pathology and should be considered the gold standard diagnostic test for Achilles tendinopathy.

References

Guideline

Management of Achilles Tendon Injuries

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

What is the best clinical test for Achilles tendinopathy?

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.