H. pylori Testing: Breath Test vs. Stool Test
Either the urea breath test (UBT) or stool antigen test (SAT) alone is sufficient for diagnosing H. pylori infection; both tests do not need to be performed simultaneously. 1
Diagnostic Test Characteristics
Urea Breath Test (UBT)
- Considered the gold standard for diagnosing active H. pylori infection 1
- Sensitivity: 88-95% 2
- Specificity: 95-100% 2
- Requires fasting for at least 6 hours 1
- Protocol should include citric acid in the test meal for optimal results 1
Stool Antigen Test (SAT)
- Comparable accuracy to UBT 1
- Sensitivity: 94% 2
- Specificity: 92% 2
- Requires proper laboratory processing 1
- Needs an acorn-sized stool sample 1
Test Selection Algorithm
Initial Diagnosis:
- Choose either UBT or SAT based on:
- Local availability
- Patient preference
- Cost considerations (UBT typically more expensive than SAT)
- Choose either UBT or SAT based on:
Post-Treatment Confirmation:
Important Considerations
Medication Interference
Must discontinue before testing:
No need to discontinue:
Common Pitfalls
- False-negative results may occur due to:
Special Populations
Primary Care Setting:
Patients with Bleeding Peptic Ulcer:
Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia:
- Testing for H. pylori with treatment if positive may assist in resolving iron deficiency 2
When to Consider Endoscopy-Based Testing
- Patients with:
In these cases, obtain biopsies from both antrum and body for histological examination 1.
Remember that while both tests are highly accurate, selecting one appropriate test based on the clinical context and patient factors is sufficient and more cost-effective than performing both tests simultaneously.