Should Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan), Xarelto (rivaroxaban), and Lasix (furosemide) be continued in a palliative care setting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Entresto, Xarelto, and Lasix in Palliative Care

In palliative care settings, Lasix (furosemide) should be continued for symptom management, while Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) and Xarelto (rivaroxaban) should be evaluated for discontinuation based on the patient's goals of care, symptom burden, and life expectancy.

Medication-Specific Recommendations

Lasix (Furosemide)

  • Continue furosemide as it provides direct symptom relief from congestion and edema
  • Loop diuretics are considered essential medications in palliative care for managing dyspnea and fluid overload 1
  • The European Society of Cardiology specifically identifies furosemide as a medication appropriate for anticipatory prescribing in palliative care 1
  • For select patients with severe symptoms, home administration of IV or subcutaneous furosemide can be considered 1

Entresto (Sacubitril/Valsartan)

  • Consider discontinuation as life expectancy shortens
  • While Entresto can prevent heart failure hospitalization, its primary benefit is long-term rather than immediate symptom relief 1
  • As patients approach end of life, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors may become less tolerable and require downtitration for symptomatic hypotension 1
  • Quality of life benefits from Entresto 2 must be balanced against:
    • Pill burden
    • Risk of hypotension
    • Limited time to benefit in palliative care context

Xarelto (Rivaroxaban)

  • Consider discontinuation based on goals of care discussion
  • The AHA guidelines specifically note that "in patients with ESCVD, the time to benefit may be longer than a patient's anticipated life expectancy; therefore, it may be practical to stop anticoagulation" 1
  • Risk of bleeding increases in patients >75 years, those with renal impairment, and patients with frailty 1
  • Abrupt discontinuation increases thrombotic risk, so careful consideration is needed 3
  • Shared decision-making should include discussion of stroke risk versus bleeding risk and align with patient preferences 1

Decision-Making Algorithm

  1. Assess life expectancy and goals of care

    • Weeks to days: Prioritize symptom management only
    • Months: Consider medication burden versus benefit
  2. Evaluate symptom burden

    • Congestion/edema: Continue or increase Lasix
    • Hypotension: Consider reducing or stopping Entresto
    • Bleeding risk: Evaluate need for Xarelto
  3. Consider medication burden

    • Reduce total pill count when possible
    • Prioritize medications that directly improve symptoms
  4. Implement changes gradually

    • Taper medications rather than abrupt discontinuation
    • Monitor for symptom changes after medication adjustments

Important Considerations

  • Symptom management is the priority in palliative care rather than disease modification or prevention 1
  • Shared decision-making should incorporate benefits, risks, and patient preferences 1
  • Monitor for hypotension which is more common with Entresto (15.9% vs 5.7% with conventional therapy) 4
  • Avoid abrupt discontinuation of Xarelto due to increased thrombotic risk; consider bridging or gradual tapering 3
  • Recognize that patient preferences may evolve as disease progresses, requiring reassessment of medication goals 1

By focusing on medications that provide direct symptom relief while reducing those primarily aimed at long-term outcomes, the medication regimen can be optimized to enhance quality of life in the palliative care setting.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.