Role of Fecal Lactoferrin Testing in Diagnosing Causes of Chronic Diarrhea
Fecal lactoferrin testing is recommended as a useful screening tool for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with chronic diarrhea, but should not be used to establish specific infectious causes of diarrhea. 1
Understanding Fecal Lactoferrin
Fecal lactoferrin is a glycoprotein expressed by activated neutrophils that serves as a surrogate marker for intestinal inflammation. Key characteristics include:
- Remains stable during stool transport and processing, unlike fecal leukocytes which degrade quickly 1, 2
- Sensitivity of approximately 83% and specificity of 75% at standard threshold (7.25 μg/g) for detecting intestinal inflammation 2
- 100% specific for ruling out irritable bowel syndrome when elevated 3
Clinical Applications in Chronic Diarrhea Evaluation
Primary Use: Screening for Inflammatory vs. Non-inflammatory Causes
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Screening
- The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) suggests using either fecal calprotectin or fecal lactoferrin to screen for IBD in patients with chronic diarrhea (conditional recommendation, low quality evidence) 1
- Helps distinguish inflammatory from functional disorders with high negative predictive value (99%) 4
Distinguishing Functional from Organic Disease
Limitations and Inappropriate Uses
Not Recommended for Specific Infectious Diagnosis
- The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) strongly recommends against using fecal lactoferrin to establish the cause of acute infectious diarrhea (strong recommendation, moderate evidence) 1
False Positives
False Negatives
- May occur in approximately 17% of patients with active IBD
- More common in isolated small bowel Crohn's disease 2
Diagnostic Algorithm for Chronic Diarrhea
Initial Evaluation
Additional Testing Based on Lactoferrin Results
Negative lactoferrin + IBS-like symptoms:
Positive lactoferrin:
- Proceed to colonoscopy with biopsies to evaluate for IBD, microscopic colitis
- Consider upper endoscopy if small bowel disease suspected 2
Comparative Value with Other Tests
Fecal Calprotectin vs. Lactoferrin
Serum Inflammatory Markers
- ESR and CRP are less accurate than fecal markers
- AGA suggests against using ESR or CRP to screen for IBD (conditional recommendation, low quality evidence) 1
Cost-Effectiveness Considerations
- Screening with fecal lactoferrin before culture can increase the yield of stool cultures fivefold 5
- Can reduce the cost per positive culture result by over $800 5
- More cost-effective than performing endoscopy on all patients with chronic diarrhea 6
Practical Clinical Pearls
- Fecal lactoferrin testing is most valuable as an initial screening tool to determine which patients need endoscopic evaluation
- A negative test effectively rules out IBD in most cases due to high negative predictive value
- The test should be interpreted in clinical context, as false positives can occur with various inflammatory conditions
- In infants consuming human milk, interpretation may be difficult as lactoferrin is a normal component of human milk 1
Remember that while fecal lactoferrin is a valuable screening tool for inflammation, endoscopy with biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing specific causes of chronic diarrhea.