What is the approach to managing an ovarian mass?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The approach to managing an ovarian mass involves a systematic evaluation using the O-RADS US risk stratification and management system, which provides a means to consistently interpret ultrasound reports and decrease ambiguity in assigning risk of malignancy 1.

Key Components of Evaluation

  • A thorough history and physical examination
  • Transvaginal ultrasound as the initial imaging modality of choice, with attention to mass characteristics such as size, solid components, septations, and vascularity
  • CA-125 testing, particularly in postmenopausal women, though it has limitations in premenopausal patients
  • Risk stratification tools like the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) or IOTA Simple Rules to determine the likelihood of malignancy

Management Strategies

  • Management depends on patient age, menopausal status, and risk assessment
  • Low-risk masses in premenopausal women may be observed with follow-up ultrasound in 6-12 weeks
  • Higher-risk masses require gynecologic oncology referral
  • Surgical management includes laparoscopic or open approaches depending on suspicion of malignancy
  • For suspected malignancy, a staging procedure with hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node assessment is performed
  • Fertility-sparing surgery may be considered in young patients with early-stage disease

Importance of Accurate Staging

  • Accurate staging is crucial for determining the initial treatment for ovarian cancer
  • Referral to a gynecologic oncologist for optimal staging and debulking is the second most important determinant for survival after tumor stage in patients with ovarian carcinoma 1
  • Imaging modalities such as CT, FDG-PET/CT, and MRI are used to assess the resectability of tumors and the need for postoperative chemotherapy 1

From the Research

Approach to Managing an Ovarian Mass

The approach to managing an ovarian mass involves a systematic evaluation and referral process to determine the risk of malignancy and appropriate management. Key steps include:

  • Initial workup of a perimenopausal or postmenopausal woman presenting with an adnexal mass, including evaluation of symptoms and signs suggestive of malignancy, such as persistent pelvic/abdominal pain, urinary urgency/frequency, increased abdominal size/bloating, and difficulty eating, as well as CA125 measurement 2
  • Transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound examination as part of the initial workup of a complex adnexal/ovarian mass 2, 3
  • Standardized ultrasound reports to include size and unilateral/bilateral location of the adnexal mass, possible origin, thickness of septations, presence of excrescences and internal solid components, vascular flow distribution pattern, and presence or absence of ascites 2
  • Calculation of the risk of malignancy index II score to identify pelvic mass with high malignant potential 2
  • Referral to a gynaecologic oncologist for assessment and optimal surgical management for patients deemed to have a high risk of an underlying malignancy 2, 4, 5

Investigation and Management

Investigation for an ovarian mass includes:

  • Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound 3
  • Doppler ultrasonography to discriminate ovarian lesions and evaluate adnexal masses 6
  • Consideration of complications such as cyst rupture and torsion, with torsion being a gynaecological emergency requiring urgent review 3 Management may involve:
  • Conservative management for benign ovarian masses, with the aim of reducing unnecessary surgery and long-term health complications, maintaining fertility, and decreasing operative costs 4
  • Surgical management for malignant or potentially malignant masses, with referral to a gynaecologic oncologist for optimal management 2, 4, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Initial evaluation and referral guidelines for management of pelvic/ovarian masses.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2009

Research

Investigation and management of an ovarian mass.

Australian family physician, 2015

Research

Guideline No. 404: Initial Investigation and Management of Benign Ovarian Masses.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2020

Research

[Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction, 2001

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.