What statistical measure should determine whether a patient with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of 130 mg/dL should continue taking a lipid-lowering medication, considering the benefits and side effects after nearing the target value?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The correct option for determining whether a patient should continue taking a lipid-lowering medication when their LDL is around 130 mg/dL is the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) or Hazard Ratio, as these measures provide information about the relative risk reduction of cardiovascular events that can be achieved by continuing the medication compared to discontinuing it. When deciding whether to continue statin therapy or other lipid-lowering medications, clinicians should consider the hazard ratio or NNT to weigh the potential benefits (reduced cardiovascular events) against possible side effects, as seen in studies such as 1 and 1. Even when a patient is approaching but hasn't fully reached their target LDL level, the hazard ratio or NNT helps quantify the incremental benefit of continuing therapy. This is particularly important in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, where the decision to continue medication should be based on the patient's overall risk profile rather than solely on whether they've reached an arbitrary LDL target.

Key Considerations

  • The patient's overall risk profile, including the presence of other risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, or family history of cardiovascular disease, should be taken into account when making decisions about continuing lipid-lowering therapy, as noted in 1 and 1.
  • The potential benefits of continuing therapy, including reduced risk of cardiovascular events, should be weighed against the potential risks and side effects of the medication, as discussed in 1 and 1.
  • The use of hazard ratio or NNT can help clinicians make informed decisions about continuing therapy, as these measures provide a quantitative estimate of the potential benefits and risks of treatment.

Relevant Guidelines

  • The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend that clinicians consider the patient's overall risk profile and the potential benefits and risks of therapy when making decisions about continuing lipid-lowering medication, as seen in 1 and 1.
  • The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines recommend that clinicians consider the patient's LDL level, as well as other risk factors, when making decisions about continuing lipid-lowering therapy, as noted in 1 and 1.

From the Research

Determining Continuation of Lipid-Lowering Medication

To determine whether a patient with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of 130 mg/dL should continue taking a lipid-lowering medication, several factors should be considered, including the benefits and side effects of the treatment.

  • The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) recommendations suggest that patients at very high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) benefit from treatment that lowers LDL cholesterol plasma levels to ≤70 mg/dL 2.
  • A study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association found that many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are unaware of their underlying disease risk, reasons for taking lipid-lowering medications, current LDL-C levels, or treatment goals 3.
  • Research suggests that there may be an optimal LDL-C level, below which the incidence of cardiovascular events is no longer reduced. A subanalysis of the REAL-CAD study found that the risk of cardiovascular events decreased monotonically until the LDL-C level was lowered to 70 mg/dL, but when the level was further reduced, the risk was independent of LDL-C 4.
  • A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis published in JAMA Cardiology found that an alternative LDL cholesterol-lowering strategy demonstrated comparable efficacy regarding 3-year death or cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with an associated reduction in LDL cholesterol levels and risk for new-onset diabetes and intolerance 5.
  • A review published in High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention discusses the potential risks and benefits of reducing LDL-C to very low levels, highlighting the importance of considering individual patient factors and monitoring for potential adverse effects 6.

Statistical Measures for Decision-Making

The decision to continue lipid-lowering medication should be based on individual patient factors, including their LDL-C level, cardiovascular risk, and potential benefits and side effects of treatment.

  • The LDL-C level of 130 mg/dL is above the recommended target of ≤70 mg/dL for patients at very high risk for CAD 2.
  • The patient's cardiovascular risk profile and potential benefits of continued treatment should be considered in the decision-making process.
  • Statistical measures such as the hazard ratio and confidence interval can be used to assess the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering treatment 4, 5.

Related Questions

What is the best management approach for a patient with significantly elevated total cholesterol and LDL (Low-Density Lipoprotein) levels?
What is the 95% confidence interval for the true mean Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level?
What is the next step in managing elevated Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in a 37-year-old female patient with hyperlipidemia?
What is the best management approach for a 75-year-old male with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and an unfavorable lipid profile, characterized by low High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and elevated Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) levels?
What is the target LDL cholesterol level in a patient with hypertension and dyslipidemia at high risk for cardiovascular events?
What laboratory tests should be ordered for a 28-year-old female presenting with secondary amenorrhea (absence of menstruation) for 3 months, with a history of pregnancy at 27 years of age, suspected to be experiencing lactational amenorrhea (amenorrhea due to breastfeeding)?
Does Cresemba (isavuconazonium sulfate) cause esophageal pill-induced injury, also known as pill esophagitis?
What is the cause of acute urinary retention with hematuria (blood in urine)?
What causes a shift from a declining to a stable population growth trend with an increased proportion of elderly individuals?
What is the interpretation of a reactive Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test with non-reactive Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies?
What is the diagnosis and treatment for Hemorrhagic (bleeding) Cystitis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.