Role of Tigecycline in Intra-Abdominal Infections
Tigecycline is recommended as a single-agent therapy for mild-to-moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infections, but should be used with caution due to its very broad spectrum and potential for promoting resistance. 1
Indications and FDA Approval
Tigecycline is FDA-approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by susceptible isolates of:
- Citrobacter freundii
- Enterobacter cloacae
- Escherichia coli
- Klebsiella oxytoca
- Klebsiella pneumoniae
- Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible isolates)
- Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates)
- Streptococcus anginosus group
- Various Bacteroides species
- Clostridium perfringens
- Peptostreptococcus micros 2
Efficacy in Intra-Abdominal Infections
Clinical trials have demonstrated tigecycline's efficacy in complicated intra-abdominal infections:
- In FDA registration trials, tigecycline showed clinical cure rates of 91.3% versus 89.9% for imipenem/cilastatin in microbiologically evaluable patients 2
- Real-world European observational studies reported favorable clinical response rates of 77.4% overall, with 80.6% for patients receiving tigecycline as monotherapy 3
Appropriate Use in Community-Acquired Infections
For mild-to-moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infections:
- Tigecycline is recommended as a single-agent therapy option alongside ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, ertapenem, and moxifloxacin 1
- The standard dosing regimen is 100 mg IV initial dose, followed by 50 mg IV every 12 hours for 5-14 days 2
Concerns and Limitations
Despite its efficacy, there are important concerns regarding tigecycline use:
- The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines express concern about tigecycline's very broad spectrum, including activity against MRSA and various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms not commonly seen in appendix-derived infection 1
- Tigecycline performs poorly in bacteremic patients due to poor plasma concentrations, with a higher risk of failing to clear bacteremia 1
- An increase in all-cause mortality has been observed in meta-analyses of clinical trials comparing tigecycline to other antibiotics 2
Role in Multidrug-Resistant Infections
Tigecycline may have a specific role in treating infections caused by resistant pathogens:
- It remains an option for complicated IAIs due to favorable in vitro activity against anaerobic organisms, enterococci, several ESBL-producing bacteria, and some carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae 1
- For carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) intra-abdominal infections, tigecycline in combination with colistin or meropenem may be considered, particularly in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock 1
Dosing Considerations
Standard dosing:
- 100 mg IV initial dose, followed by 50 mg IV every 12 hours 2
Higher dosing may be considered in specific scenarios:
- For infections other than FDA-approved indications (particularly pulmonary infections), a high-dose regimen (200 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg every 12 hours) may be considered if the tigecycline MIC is ≤1 mg/L and the isolate is resistant to other agents 1
- Some evidence suggests improved outcomes with high-dose regimens in critically ill and obese patients 4
Practical Recommendations
For mild-to-moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infections:
For healthcare-associated or resistant infections:
Avoid tigecycline in:
Monitor for common adverse events:
- Nausea (17.6%) and vomiting (12.6%) are the most commonly reported side effects 5
Conclusion
Tigecycline has a defined but limited role in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. While effective as monotherapy for mild-to-moderate community-acquired infections, its very broad spectrum raises concerns about appropriate antimicrobial stewardship. For multidrug-resistant infections, particularly those caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, tigecycline may be valuable as part of combination therapy regimens. The increased mortality risk observed in clinical trials warrants careful consideration of alternative treatments when available.