Is a premature atrial contraction (PAC) burden of 2.92% on a Holter monitor considered high?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is a PAC Burden of 2.92% High on Holter Monitor?

A PAC burden of 2.92% on Holter monitoring is moderately elevated and warrants clinical attention due to its association with increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation.

Understanding PAC Burden and Normal Values

PACs (premature atrial contractions) are common findings on Holter monitoring, with most adults having at least some PACs during 24-hour monitoring. To interpret the significance of a 2.92% burden:

  • Normal PAC frequency varies by age:

    • Ages 50-55: median 0.8 PACs/hour (interquartile range 0.4-1.8)
    • Ages 55-60: median 1.1 PACs/hour (0.5-2.4)
    • Ages 60-65: median 1.4 PACs/hour (0.7-4.6)
    • Ages 65-70: median 2.3 PACs/hour (0.8-6.9)
    • Ages ≥70: median 2.6 PACs/hour (1.2-6.5) 1
  • A 2.92% burden translates to approximately 42 PACs per hour (assuming an average heart rate of 70 beats per minute)

  • This exceeds the median values for all age groups, placing it in the upper quartiles, particularly for patients under 65

Clinical Significance of Elevated PAC Burden

The significance of this PAC burden relates to its association with several important clinical outcomes:

  1. Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Development

    • Higher PAC frequency correlates with increased risk of developing clinical AF
    • Recent evidence shows a dose-dependent relationship between PAC frequency and AF detection, with significantly higher AF detection rates in patients with >500 PACs per 24 hours 2
  2. Left Atrial Remodeling and Dysfunction

    • Frequent PACs (≥100/24 hours) are associated with:
      • Reduced left atrial peak contractile strain
      • Larger left atrial volume index
      • Impaired left atrial contractile function 3
  3. Stroke Risk

    • PACs are part of the pathophysiological pathway leading to AF 4
    • AF is a major risk factor for stroke, with higher AF burden correlating with increased stroke risk 5

Risk Stratification and Management Approach

For a patient with a 2.92% PAC burden:

  1. Assess for Modifiable Risk Factors

    • Hypertension, obesity, sleep apnea, alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity are associated with increased PAC frequency 1
    • Address these factors as they may reduce PAC burden and subsequent AF risk
  2. Evaluate for Structural Heart Disease

    • Unlike frequent PVCs, frequent PACs have not been shown to directly cause cardiomyopathy 6
    • However, they may indicate underlying cardiac abnormalities
  3. Consider Extended Monitoring

    • For patients with this level of PAC burden, especially with other risk factors for AF, consider extended monitoring to detect potential paroxysmal AF
    • According to the 2023 ACC/AHA guidelines, device-detected AF requires consideration for anticoagulation based on episode duration and underlying thromboembolic risk 4
  4. Follow-up Strategy

    • Regular follow-up with repeat Holter monitoring may be warranted to assess for progression to clinical AF
    • Consider more intensive monitoring in patients with additional risk factors for stroke

Conclusion

A PAC burden of 2.92% is moderately elevated and represents a potential risk factor for developing atrial fibrillation and subsequent adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While not immediately concerning for structural heart disease, this finding warrants attention to modifiable risk factors and consideration of more intensive monitoring for AF, especially in patients with additional stroke risk factors.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.