What is the mBFM (methotrexate, bleomycin, fluorouracil, mitoxantrone) regimen used for?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

mBFM Regimen: A Chemotherapy Protocol for Pediatric B-cell Malignancies

The mBFM (methotrexate, bleomycin, fluorouracil, mitoxantrone) regimen is primarily used for treating pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, particularly Burkitt lymphoma.

Background and Clinical Applications

The mBFM regimen represents a modification of the original Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) protocol, which has been a cornerstone in treating pediatric hematologic malignancies. The BFM protocols have demonstrated significant efficacy in:

  • Pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL)
  • Burkitt lymphoma and other mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas
  • Some cases of T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma

Protocol Components and Administration

The mBFM regimen typically includes:

  • Methotrexate: High-dose (5 g/m²) administered as a 24-hour infusion 1
  • Bleomycin: Used in specific phases of the protocol
  • Fluorouracil (5-FU): Administered intravenously
  • Mitoxantrone: An anthracycline derivative that may replace or supplement doxorubicin in some protocols

The protocol is administered in multiple phases:

  1. Cytoreductive prephase: Often includes prednisone and cyclophosphamide
  2. Induction: Intensive chemotherapy to achieve remission
  3. Consolidation: Further therapy to eliminate residual disease
  4. Maintenance: Extended therapy to prevent relapse

Efficacy and Outcomes

The BFM protocols have shown impressive results in pediatric populations:

  • 5-year event-free survival rates of 78-85% for standard and medium-risk groups 2
  • Complete remission rates of approximately 95% in adult studies comparing BFM to other regimens 3
  • Particularly high efficacy in B-ALL, with 5-year survival rates reaching 71% even in adult patients 4

Risk Stratification

Treatment intensity is adjusted based on risk factors 5:

  • Minimal Residual Disease (MRD): Critical prognostic factor at end of induction
  • CNS involvement: May require additional intrathecal therapy
  • Response to initial therapy: Poor early response indicates higher risk

Toxicity Management

Common toxicities that require monitoring include:

  • Myelosuppression: Particularly leukopenia (67% grade 3-4) 6
  • Liver enzyme elevations: Generally mild and manageable 3
  • Tumor lysis syndrome: Especially in patients with high tumor burden
  • CNS toxicity: Reduced with modern protocols using lower-dose cranial radiation

Modern Protocol Considerations

Current adaptations of the BFM protocol often include:

  • Rituximab addition: For CD20-positive B-cell malignancies, improving outcomes in high-risk patients 7
  • Nelarabine incorporation: For T-ALL, especially in MRD-positive patients 5
  • Bortezomib: Has shown benefit in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma but not leukemia 5

Comparison to Alternative Regimens

The NCCN guidelines recognize several effective regimens for pediatric B-cell malignancies 7:

  • BFM-based protocols: Including mBFM variants
  • FAB/LMB96: Another effective regimen, particularly for Group A and B patients
  • COG ANHL1131: With or without rituximab based on risk stratification
  • Hyper-CVAD: Alternative regimen, particularly in adult patients

Conclusion

The mBFM regimen represents an effective, risk-adapted approach to treating pediatric B-cell malignancies with high cure rates. Modern adaptations continue to refine the protocol to maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.