What is the BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster) regimen for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) Regimen for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

The BFM regimen is a cornerstone multiagent chemotherapy protocol for ALL that includes a 4-drug induction regimen with vincristine, an anthracycline (daunorubicin/doxorubicin), a corticosteroid (prednisone/dexamethasone), and L-asparaginase, followed by structured consolidation and maintenance phases. 1

Core Components of the BFM Regimen

Induction Phase

  • The primary goal is to reduce tumor burden by clearing leukemic cells from bone marrow 1
  • Standard 4-drug backbone includes:
    • Vincristine
    • Anthracycline (daunorubicin or doxorubicin)
    • Corticosteroid (prednisone or dexamethasone)
    • L-asparaginase/pegaspargase 1
  • For standard-risk pediatric patients, a 3-drug induction (without anthracyclines) may be used 1
  • Antimetabolites (methotrexate, cytarabine, mercaptopurine) are often included for CNS prophylaxis 1

Consolidation Phase

  • Designed to eliminate residual leukemic cells after induction 1
  • Intensity varies based on risk stratification - lower-risk patients receive less intensive consolidation while higher-risk patients receive more intensive therapy 1
  • May include high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine 1

Maintenance Phase

  • Long-term therapy to prevent relapse 1
  • Typically continues for a total treatment duration of 24 months 2

CNS Prophylaxis

  • All BFM regimens include CNS-directed therapy 1
  • May include intrathecal methotrexate and cranial radiation (dose reduced to 12 Gy in more recent protocols) 3

Risk Stratification in BFM Protocols

  • Risk stratification guides treatment intensity and has evolved over time 4
  • Modern risk assessment includes:
    • Clinical factors: age, WBC count, extramedullary involvement 4
    • Biological characteristics: immunophenotype, cytogenetics 4
    • Early treatment response: prednisone response, minimal residual disease (MRD) 4
  • Poor prognostic factors include:
    • Elevated WBC count (≥30×10⁹/L for B-cell lineage; ≥100×10⁹/L for T-cell lineage)
    • Hypodiploidy
    • MLL/KMT2A rearrangements 1

Evolution and Modifications of BFM Regimen

  • Originally developed for pediatric patients but has been adapted for adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients 1
  • The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) modified the BFM approach for adults by adding cyclophosphamide to the 4-drug induction regimen 1, 2
  • Recent modifications include:
    • More rapid drug sequencing during induction 3
    • Incorporation of MRD assessment to guide therapy intensity 1, 4
    • Reduced use of anthracyclines and cranial radiation to minimize toxicity 3

Clinical Outcomes

  • The BFM approach has significantly improved survival rates in pediatric ALL 3
  • In children, 6-year event-free survival rates of approximately 78-85% have been reported 3
  • Outcomes are less favorable in adults, with 5-year overall survival rates of 32-39% in Ph-negative ALL 5
  • Treatment abandonment (15%) and infectious complications (19.5%) are significant challenges in resource-constrained settings 6

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Dexamethasone versus prednisone:
    • Dexamethasone significantly reduces CNS relapse risk and improves event-free survival 1
    • However, dexamethasone is associated with higher risks of induction mortality, neuropsychiatric events, and myopathy 1
    • No conclusive advantage for overall survival has been demonstrated 1
  • Early response assessment is critical:
    • Poor response to prednisone pre-phase (>1,000 blasts/μL after 7 days) identifies high-risk patients with only 35% survival 4
    • MRD assessment provides more refined risk stratification 1, 4
  • Age-specific considerations:
    • Treatment intensity is typically reduced for patients ≥65 years or those with substantial comorbidities 1
    • Chronologic age alone is a poor surrogate for determining fitness for therapy 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.