Initial Treatment for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS)
For patients diagnosed with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), antiplatelet therapy is the recommended initial treatment, not anticoagulation, as antiplatelet agents have been shown to reduce recurrent stroke risk while minimizing bleeding complications. 1
Definition and Diagnostic Approach
ESUS refers to non-lacunar ischemic strokes without an identified source of embolism despite standard diagnostic evaluation. Before initiating treatment:
- Ensure complete diagnostic workup has excluded other stroke etiologies
- Confirm absence of:
- Significant atherosclerosis (≥50% stenosis)
- Major-risk cardioembolic source requiring anticoagulation
- Lacunar (small vessel) disease
- Other specific stroke cause
Initial Treatment Algorithm
Step 1: Acute Management
For minor ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤3) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 ≥4):
- Initiate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel
- Loading doses: Aspirin 160-325mg + Clopidogrel 300-600mg
- Continue DAPT for 21-90 days 1
- Ideally start within 12-24 hours of symptom onset (after excluding hemorrhage)
For mild-moderate ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤5):
- Alternative DAPT option: Aspirin plus ticagrelor
- Loading doses: Aspirin 300-325mg + Ticagrelor 180mg
- Continue for 30 days 1
Step 2: Long-term Secondary Prevention
- After initial DAPT period, transition to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) 1
- Options include:
- Aspirin 81-325mg daily
- Clopidogrel 75mg daily
- Aspirin 25mg + extended-release dipyridamole 200mg twice daily
Important Considerations
Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation
- Prolonged cardiac monitoring is essential in ESUS patients 1, 2
- Detection of AF increases with monitoring duration (up to 20% with 3 years of monitoring)
- Higher AF detection associated with:
- Advanced age
- Left atrial enlargement
- Cortical stroke location
- Increased atrial premature beats
Anticoagulation
- Do not initiate oral anticoagulation in ESUS patients without documented AF 1
Special Situations
- If AF is detected during monitoring, switch from antiplatelet to anticoagulation
- For patients with left ventricular injury, consider anticoagulation (emerging evidence suggests possible benefit) 6
- For patients with PFO, multidisciplinary evaluation is necessary to decide between PFO closure and medical treatment 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Continuing DAPT beyond 90 days increases bleeding risk without additional benefit 1
- Empiric anticoagulation without documented AF is not recommended and increases bleeding risk 1
- Inadequate cardiac monitoring may miss occult AF that would benefit from anticoagulation
- Failing to reassess treatment if new information emerges (e.g., detection of AF)
By following this evidence-based approach, you can optimize outcomes for patients with ESUS while minimizing risks of recurrent stroke and bleeding complications.