What is the formula to determine the pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) in patients with atrial septal defects?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pulmonary-to-Systemic Flow Ratio (Qp:Qs) Calculation in Atrial Septal Defects

The pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) in patients with atrial septal defects is calculated by dividing the pulmonary blood flow by the systemic blood flow, with values ≥1.5:1 indicating a hemodynamically significant shunt that typically warrants closure. 1

Formula and Calculation Method

The Qp:Qs ratio is calculated using the Fick principle during cardiac catheterization:

Qp:Qs = (SaO₂ - MvO₂) / (PvO₂ - PaO₂)

Where:

  • SaO₂ = Systemic arterial oxygen saturation
  • MvO₂ = Mixed venous oxygen saturation (from pulmonary artery)
  • PvO₂ = Pulmonary venous oxygen saturation
  • PaO₂ = Pulmonary arterial oxygen saturation

Alternative Calculation Method

Qp:Qs can also be calculated using cardiac output measurements:

Qp:Qs = Pulmonary Cardiac Index / Systemic Cardiac Index

Clinical Example

A 24-year-old female with a large secundum ASD (15×15 mm) underwent right heart catheterization with the following findings 1:

  • Pulmonary arterial pressure: 57 mmHg
  • Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 3 mmHg
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance: 880 dyn·s·cm⁻⁵
  • Pulmonary cardiac index: 3.2 L·min⁻¹·m⁻²
  • Systemic cardiac index: 2.6 L·min⁻¹·m⁻²

Calculation: Qp:Qs = 3.2 / 2.6 = 1.22

This ratio of 1.22:1 indicates a modest left-to-right shunt, but with the patient's elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, repair surgery was contraindicated.

Clinical Significance and Decision-Making

The Qp:Qs ratio is critical for clinical decision-making in ASD management:

  • Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1: Indicates a hemodynamically significant shunt that typically warrants closure 1
  • Qp:Qs <1.5:1: Generally considered a small shunt that may not require intervention unless the patient is symptomatic

Additional Hemodynamic Parameters to Consider:

  • Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP): Should be <50% of systemic pressure for safe closure 1
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR): Should be <1/3 of systemic vascular resistance for safe closure 1

Clinical Application Algorithm

  1. Measure Qp:Qs ratio during cardiac catheterization

    • If ≥1.5:1: Consider closure if other criteria are met
    • If <1.5:1: Closure may still be considered if symptomatic
  2. Assess pulmonary pressures and resistance:

    • PASP <50% systemic and PVR <1/3 systemic: Proceed with closure
    • PASP ≥50% systemic or PVR >1/3 but <2/3 systemic: Careful evaluation needed
    • PASP >2/3 systemic or PVR >2/3 systemic: Closure contraindicated (Eisenmenger physiology) 1
  3. Evaluate for right heart enlargement (echocardiography)

    • Present: Strengthens indication for closure
    • Absent: Reassess clinical significance of shunt

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Oxygen consumption assumptions can lead to inaccuracies in Fick calculations
  • Bidirectional shunts may complicate measurements; careful sampling is required
  • Exercise testing may reveal latent pulmonary hypertension not apparent at rest 2
  • Fenestrated device closure may be considered in high-risk patients with pulmonary hypertension to allow pressure relief if needed 3, 4

By accurately calculating and interpreting the Qp:Qs ratio alongside other hemodynamic parameters, clinicians can make informed decisions about ASD management to improve morbidity, mortality, and quality of life outcomes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.