What percentage of patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department (ED) have a myocardial infarction (MI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Percentage of Patients with Chest Pain in ED Who Have MI

Approximately 8-17% of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain have myocardial infarction (MI). 1

Epidemiology of Chest Pain in the ED

The prevalence of chest pain varies across different clinical settings, with the underlying cause differing significantly depending on where patients are evaluated:

  • Emergency Department: 45% of chest pain cases have cardiac origin 1

    • 17% ultimately meet criteria for cardiac ischemia 1
    • 8% have myocardial infarction 1
    • The remaining cases are attributed to musculoskeletal (14%), pulmonary (5%), gastrointestinal (6%), psychiatric (8%), and other causes (26%) 1
  • Ambulance Setting: Higher prevalence of cardiac causes (69%) 1

  • Primary Care Setting: Lower prevalence of cardiac causes (20%) 1

Diagnostic Challenges

The diagnosis of MI in chest pain patients presents several challenges:

  • Only 30-40% of patients with acute chest pain who develop MI initially have ST-elevations on hospital admission ECG 2
  • About one-third of patients with acute chest pain present with a normal ECG, yet 5-40% of these patients may have an evolving MI 2
  • Among patients with normal ECGs and no evidence of ischemia, approximately 1.3% will subsequently be diagnosed with MI 3
  • For patients with abnormal ECGs but no clear evidence of ischemia, about 3.6% will be diagnosed with MI 3
  • For patients with ECGs questionable for ischemia, 14.6% will be diagnosed with MI 3
  • For patients with ECGs showing definite ischemia, 54.2% will be diagnosed with MI 3

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is essential for appropriate management:

  • High-Risk Features:

    • Ongoing chest pain
    • Ischemic ECG changes
    • Positive troponin test
    • Left ventricular failure
    • Hemodynamic abnormalities 1
  • Low-Risk Features:

    • Normal ECG
    • Negative cardiac biomarkers
    • No hemodynamic instability 4

Management Implications

The identification of MI among chest pain patients has important management implications:

  • Patients with normal ECGs are at extremely low risk and may be candidates for outpatient evaluation 3
  • Patients with chest pain and ST segment abnormalities suggestive of ischemia should be admitted for further evaluation 3
  • Chest pain units have been shown to be safe, effective, and cost-saving for evaluating patients with chest pain 1
  • Low-risk patients without evidence of MI may be safely discharged from the ED, though follow-up is essential 4

Common Pitfalls

  • Missed MI: 2-4% of patients with evolving MI are inappropriately discharged from the ED due to normal ECG findings 1
  • Gender Bias: Women are more likely than men to be inappropriately discharged 1
  • Delayed Treatment: Self-medication with nitrates or antacids can delay proper diagnosis and treatment 1
  • Reliance on ECG Alone: ECG has limited sensitivity for detecting MI, particularly in the early stages 2

Conclusion

While chest pain is a common presenting complaint in the ED (5-20% of all ED visits), only a minority of these patients (8-17%) will ultimately be diagnosed with MI. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with missed MI, a systematic approach to evaluation is essential, including ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and appropriate risk stratification.

Related Questions

Is it appropriate to send a patient with chest pain to the Emergency Room (ER) from a clinic without an Electrocardiogram (EKG) machine?
What is the management approach for a 58-year-old male patient with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings showing normal sinus rhythm and nonspecific ST and T wave abnormalities?
Is a slight inferior polarization disturbance on an electrocardiogram (EKG) a concern, especially when starting a weight loss journey?
What is the best initial step in managing a 68-year-old man with progressive shortness of breath, orthopnea, and a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and myocardial infarction, presenting with tachycardia, hypoxemia, jugular venous distension, and bilateral crackles?
Does a 28-year-old with anxiety, normal body mass index (BMI), and recent cessation of marijuana and vaping, who is taking Adderall (amphetamine and dextroamphetamine) and has possible left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on electrocardiogram (EKG), require referral for further cardiovascular evaluation?
What is the severity and risk of sudden cardiac arrest in a patient with a myocardial infarction (MI) and stable vital signs?
What is the initial treatment for a patient presenting with a fungal infection characterized by hyphae?
What is the recommended frequency for mammography screening in women over 50 years old?
What are the indications and usage guidelines for Mirena (levonorgestrel)?
What is the initial treatment for Evans syndrome?
Should I switch from Wellbutrin (bupropion) XR to immediate-release (IR) twice daily due to decreased effect by mid-afternoon?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.