Purpose of Cystatin C Test in Clinical Practice
Cystatin C testing is primarily used to more accurately estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for diagnosing and confirming chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly when creatinine-based estimates may be unreliable or when confirmation of CKD diagnosis is required. 1, 2
Key Functions of Cystatin C Testing
Primary Role in CKD Diagnosis
- Serves as a confirmatory test for CKD diagnosis, especially in adults with creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcreat) of 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m² who lack other markers of kidney damage such as albuminuria 1, 2
- Part of the recommended "triple marker" panel (serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio) for optimal CKD diagnosis and staging 1
Advantages Over Creatinine
- More sensitive for detecting early renal impairment - can detect decreased GFR at earlier stages (around 88 ml/min/1.73 m²) compared to creatinine (75 ml/min/1.73 m²) 3
- Less influenced by non-renal factors such as:
- Provides race-neutral GFR estimation, eliminating the need for race-based adjustments required with creatinine 1, 2
Clinical Applications
Improved Risk Stratification
- Strengthens the association between eGFR and important clinical outcomes:
- Cardiovascular events
- Kidney failure
- Mortality 1
Special Populations Where Cystatin C Is Particularly Valuable
- Elderly patients 1, 2
- Malnourished patients 2
- Cancer patients (especially for drug dosing calculations) 1, 2
- Patients with extreme body sizes 2
- Patients with reduced muscle mass 2
Medication Dosing
- Improves precision for drug dosing in patients with reduced renal function, particularly for:
- Carboplatin
- Topotecan 1
Clinical Implementation
When to Use Cystatin C
- Initial CKD Diagnosis: When eGFRcreat is 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m² without albuminuria 1, 2
- Special Populations: When creatinine-based eGFR may be less reliable due to:
- Abnormal body habitus
- Malnutrition
- Extremes of age 2
- Critical Treatment Decisions: When accurate GFR determination will significantly impact treatment 2
Interpretation Guidelines
- If eGFRcys or eGFRcreat-cys is <60 ml/min/1.73 m², CKD diagnosis is confirmed
- If eGFRcys or eGFRcreat-cys is ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m², CKD diagnosis is not confirmed 1, 2
Recommended Equations
- The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation (eGFRcreat-cys) generally provides the most accurate GFR estimate 2, 4
- For kidney transplant recipients, cystatin C-based equations have shown superior performance compared to creatinine-based equations 1
Limitations and Considerations
- Cystatin C may not be required for routine monitoring after CKD diagnosis is established 1
- Availability may be limited to reference laboratories rather than local facilities 5
- Cost considerations exist, though the combination of creatinine, cystatin C, and UACR is considered affordable in high-income settings 1
Clinical Impact
- Reduces misclassification of CKD - in a meta-analysis of 90,750 participants, 23% of persons with eGFR 60-74 ml/min/1.73 m² based on creatinine had eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² based on cystatin C 1
- Improves detection of harmful acute and chronic changes in kidney function 4
- May reduce healthcare inequalities by providing race-neutral GFR estimation 2, 4
Cystatin C testing represents an important advancement in kidney function assessment that provides more accurate GFR estimation, particularly in populations where creatinine-based estimates are less reliable, and should be incorporated into clinical practice for CKD diagnosis and confirmation.