Diagnosis of Blastomycosis
The diagnosis of blastomycosis requires a combination of direct visualization of the organism, culture, and antigen testing, with culture being the gold standard despite its longer turnaround time.
Diagnostic Methods
Direct Visualization
- Direct microscopic examination of respiratory specimens is the most commonly used method for rapid diagnosis 1
- Respiratory specimens can be treated with:
- Potassium hydroxide (KOH)
- Calcofluor white
- Papanicolaou stain
- Sensitivity ranges from 50-90% for respiratory specimens 1, 2
- Histopathological examination using methenamine silver or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain is the standard for extrapulmonary disease 1
Culture
- Gold standard for definitive diagnosis
- High sensitivity: 86% from sputum and 100% from bronchial washings in patients with pulmonary disease 1
- Culture confirmation should be sought in every suspected case 1
- Major limitation: slow growth requiring up to 5 weeks for results 1
Antigen Testing
- Blastomyces urinary antigen testing has high sensitivity (92.9%) 1, 2
- Can be performed on:
- Urine (preferred specimen)
- Serum
- Other body fluids
- Important limitation: significant cross-reactivity with other endemic mycoses, particularly Histoplasma capsulatum 1
- Particularly useful in cases with negative sputum cytology but subsequent positive culture 1
Serology
- Newer enzyme immunoassays (EIA) have improved sensitivity (87.8%) compared to older methods 1, 2
- Traditional serological methods (complement fixation and immunodiffusion) lack both sensitivity and specificity 1
- EIA recognizing the B. dermatitidis surface protein BAD-1 shows better performance 1
- Cross-reactivity remains an issue, with positive results observed in 6% of histoplasmosis cases 1
Diagnostic Algorithm
Initial evaluation:
- Collect respiratory specimens (sputum or bronchial washings) for:
- Direct microscopic examination with KOH or calcofluor white
- Culture
- Collect respiratory specimens (sputum or bronchial washings) for:
Additional testing:
- Urinary antigen testing (high sensitivity but cross-reactivity with other fungi)
- Serum antibody testing using EIA (moderate sensitivity)
- For extrapulmonary disease: biopsy with histopathological examination
Definitive diagnosis is established by:
- Visualization of characteristic broad-based budding yeast in clinical specimens, OR
- Isolation of B. dermatitidis in culture
Special Considerations
Immunocompromised Patients
- More likely to develop severe pulmonary infection and disseminated disease 1
- May require more aggressive diagnostic approach including:
- Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage
- Tissue biopsy
- Multiple specimen collection
Laboratory Pitfalls
False-negative results can occur with:
- Inadequate specimen collection
- Single specimen examination (multiple specimens improve yield)
- Early disease with low organism burden
False-positive antigen results due to cross-reactivity with:
- Histoplasmosis (most common)
- Coccidioidomycosis
- Paracoccidioidomycosis
- Talaromycosis 1
Diagnostic Performance Summary
- Direct visualization: 50-90% sensitivity
- Culture: 86-100% sensitivity (gold standard)
- Urinary antigen: 92.9% sensitivity with cross-reactivity
- Serum antibody (EIA): 87.8% sensitivity
The American Thoracic Society recommends using urinary antigen testing together with clinical and epidemiological data to establish the diagnosis, particularly in immunocompromised patients 1. However, due to cross-reactivity issues, a combination of diagnostic methods is typically required for accurate diagnosis.