What is the appropriate heparin (Heparin Sodium) drip for a patient with a mechanical heart valve?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Heparin infusion is recommended for patients with mechanical heart valves who require anticoagulation but need to temporarily discontinue warfarin, with a standard protocol involving a bolus dose and continuous infusion to maintain a therapeutic range of an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 1.5-2.5 times the control value or an anti-Xa level of 0.3-0.7 units/mL, as supported by the 2017 AHA/ACC guideline update 1.

The decision to use heparin bridging therapy should be individualized, taking into account the trade-offs between thrombosis and bleeding, particularly in patients with mechanical heart valves who are at higher risk of thromboembolic events 1. Key considerations include the type of mechanical valve, presence of additional risk factors such as atrial fibrillation, previous thromboembolism, or hypercoagulable conditions, and the patient's overall clinical context.

Some important points to consider when initiating heparin therapy for patients with mechanical heart valves include:

  • Starting with a bolus dose of 80 units/kg followed by a continuous infusion at 18 units/kg/hour
  • Monitoring aPTT 6 hours after initiation and adjusting the infusion rate accordingly to maintain the target therapeutic range
  • Overlapping heparin with warfarin for at least 48 hours and until the INR reaches the therapeutic range when transitioning back to warfarin therapy
  • Maintaining strict anticoagulation to minimize the risk of thromboembolism, which is critical for patients with mechanical heart valves 1.

It is also crucial to monitor patients for signs of bleeding or thrombosis throughout the heparin therapy period and to adjust the treatment plan as needed to balance the risks and benefits of anticoagulation therapy 1.

From the Research

Heparin Drip for Mechanical Heart Valve Patients

  • The appropriate heparin drip for a patient with a mechanical heart valve can be initiated with an intravenous bolus of 80 U/kg bodyweight, and an infusion of 18 U/kg/h, with the activated thromboplastin time targeted at 60-80 s 2.
  • An alternative to intravenous heparin is subcutaneous low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is prescribed in a mg/kg dose 2.
  • Studies have shown that LMWH can be used as a bridging anticoagulation therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves on long-term oral anticoagulants, with similar major adverse event rates and major bleeds compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) 3, 4, 5.
  • The choice of heparin drip may depend on the individual patient's characteristics, such as the type and position of the mechanical heart valve, as well as the presence of other risk factors for stroke or bleeding 2, 6.

Key Considerations

  • The American College of Chest Physicians recommends anticoagulation with Warfarin at an INR range of 2-3 for patients with a bileaflet mechanical valve in the aortic position, and an INR of 2.5-3.5 for patients with a mechanical valve in the mitral position 2.
  • Patients with mechanical heart valves require life-long anticoagulation, and the use of heparin drip should be carefully managed to minimize the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications 3, 6, 4, 5.
  • The efficacy and safety of LMWH compared to UFH have been demonstrated in several studies, with LMWH showing improved efficiency and safety, as well as reduced duration of hospitalization and improved patient quality of life 4, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.