Management of Second-Degree Heart Block in a 9-Year-Old Child
A 9-year-old child with second-degree heart block and no prior medical history should be referred urgently to a pediatric cardiologist for evaluation and consideration of permanent pacemaker implantation, especially if the block is Mobitz type II.
Initial Assessment and Classification
The management approach depends critically on the specific type of second-degree heart block:
Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) Second-Degree AV Block:
- Characterized by progressive PR interval prolongation before a blocked P wave
- Usually occurs at the AV node level when QRS is narrow
- Generally considered more benign than Type II, but requires careful evaluation in children
Mobitz Type II Second-Degree AV Block:
- Characterized by constant PR intervals before and after blocked P waves
- Usually occurs in the His-Purkinje system (infranodal)
- Higher risk of progression to complete heart block
- Strong indication for permanent pacing 1, 2
2:1 AV Block:
- Cannot be classified as Type I or II based on surface ECG alone
- May be nodal or infranodal
- Requires careful evaluation, especially in children
Diagnostic Evaluation
12-lead ECG: To confirm diagnosis and assess QRS morphology and duration
- Narrow QRS suggests AV nodal block (usually Type I)
- Wide QRS suggests infranodal block (often Type II)
Ambulatory ECG monitoring: To detect intermittent higher-degree AV block and assess:
Exercise testing: To assess if block worsens with exercise (suggesting infranodal disease)
Echocardiogram: To rule out structural heart disease
Management Recommendations
Immediate Management:
- For symptomatic bradycardia causing hemodynamic compromise:
- Atropine 0.02 mg/kg IV (minimum dose 0.1 mg, maximum 0.5 mg for children) may be given for temporary improvement 4
- Prepare for transcutaneous pacing if symptoms are severe and persistent
Definitive Management:
Mobitz Type II Second-Degree AV Block:
Mobitz Type I Second-Degree AV Block:
- If symptomatic (syncope, presyncope, exercise intolerance): Permanent pacing recommended
- If asymptomatic: Close monitoring with serial ECGs and ambulatory monitoring
- Consider pacing if evidence of infranodal block (wide QRS) 5
- Recent evidence suggests that even Mobitz type I block may have similar long-term outcomes to Mobitz type II without pacing 6
2:1 AV Block:
- Requires careful evaluation to determine the level of block
- In children, 2:1 block on initial ECG is associated with increased risk of progression to complete heart block 3
- Consider permanent pacing, especially if symptomatic or evidence suggests infranodal block
Important Considerations in Children
Children with second-degree heart block have a 30% risk of progressing to complete heart block or requiring a pacemaker during long-term follow-up 3
Risk factors for progression include:
- Second-degree block at maximum sinus rate
- Below normal average heart rate
- 2:1 block on initial ECG 3
Even in asymptomatic children, close monitoring is essential as progression can occur over time
Pacemaker implantation in children requires special considerations regarding lead placement, device programming, and long-term follow-up to accommodate growth
Follow-up Recommendations
For children not receiving immediate pacemaker:
- Regular cardiology follow-up every 3-6 months
- Ambulatory ECG monitoring every 6-12 months
- Immediate evaluation for any new symptoms (syncope, presyncope, exercise intolerance)
- Parent education regarding symptoms of bradycardia or heart block
For children receiving pacemakers:
- Regular device checks
- Monitoring for lead-related complications, which are more common in growing children
Conclusion
The management of second-degree heart block in children differs from adults and requires careful consideration of the type of block, presence of symptoms, and risk factors for progression. While Mobitz type II block almost always requires permanent pacing, the approach to Mobitz type I and 2:1 block should be guided by symptoms, evidence of infranodal disease, and risk factors for progression.