First-Line Imaging Modality for Women of Childbearing Age with Suspected Appendicitis
Abdominal ultrasound (US) should be the first-line imaging modality for women of childbearing age with suspected appendicitis to avoid radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. 1, 2
Rationale for Ultrasound as First-Line
- Avoids radiation exposure, which is particularly important for women of childbearing age who may be pregnant or have undiagnosed pregnancy
- Recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) in their 2024 clinical practice guidelines 1
- Provides adequate diagnostic capability without radiation risks
- Can be performed rapidly and is widely available in most emergency settings
Diagnostic Algorithm for Women of Childbearing Age
Initial Assessment: Clinical evaluation using scoring systems (AIR score, Alvarado score, or AAS)
First-Line Imaging: Abdominal ultrasound
- Benefits: No radiation exposure, good sensitivity and specificity when positive
- Limitations: Operator-dependent, may yield equivocal results (particularly with obesity or retrocecal appendix)
If Ultrasound is Conclusive:
- Positive: Proceed with appropriate management
- Negative: Consider alternative diagnoses
If Ultrasound is Equivocal/Non-Diagnostic:
Special Considerations
Confirmed Pregnancy
- Ultrasound remains first-line
- If ultrasound is equivocal, MRI is strongly recommended as the second-line imaging modality 1
- CT should be avoided due to radiation risks to the fetus
Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Don't skip imaging: Clinical diagnosis alone has high rates of false positives and negatives
- Don't proceed directly to CT: Starting with CT exposes women of childbearing age to unnecessary radiation
- Don't repeat ultrasound if initial study is equivocal: Proceed to MRI instead of repeating ultrasound 1
- Don't delay appropriate imaging: Timely diagnosis reduces risk of perforation and complications
Evidence Quality Assessment
The recommendation for ultrasound as first-line imaging is based on the 2024 IDSA guidelines, which rate this as a conditional recommendation with very low certainty of evidence 1. Despite the low certainty rating, the recommendation is strong due to the favorable risk-benefit profile of avoiding radiation exposure in women of childbearing age.
While CT offers the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 95%, specificity 94%) 2, the radiation exposure makes it less suitable as a first-line test in this population. MRI shows excellent diagnostic performance as a second-line test with sensitivity and specificity comparable to CT but without radiation exposure 3.