Differences Between Regular Sepsis and Severe Sepsis
Regular sepsis requires basic management while severe sepsis necessitates more aggressive resuscitation measures, including specific hemodynamic targets and more intensive monitoring due to the presence of organ dysfunction. 1
Definitions and Clinical Distinction
- Regular Sepsis: Defined as a life-threatening syndrome with suspected or confirmed infection
- Severe Sepsis: Sepsis with evidence of organ dysfunction, tissue hypoperfusion (defined as hypotension persisting after initial fluid challenge or blood lactate >4 mmol/L), or septic shock 2
Management Differences
Initial Assessment and Diagnostics (Both Types)
- Obtain blood cultures before starting antibiotics (within 45 minutes) 2, 1
- Obtain appropriate imaging studies to identify source of infection 2, 1
- Consider 1,3 β-D-glucan assay, mannan and anti-mannan antibody assays if invasive candidiasis is suspected 2
Antimicrobial Therapy
Regular Sepsis:
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition 1
- Daily reassessment for de-escalation once culture results available 1
Severe Sepsis:
- More urgent administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition 2
- Consider combination therapy for neutropenic patients or those with difficult-to-treat pathogens 2
- More aggressive approach to source control 1
Fluid Resuscitation
Regular Sepsis:
- Crystalloid fluid administration based on clinical assessment 1
Severe Sepsis:
- More aggressive approach with at least 30 mL/kg crystalloid for hypotension or lactate ≥4 mmol/L within first 3 hours 2, 1
- Continued fluid challenges as long as hemodynamic improvement occurs 1
Hemodynamic Support and Monitoring
Regular Sepsis:
- Basic monitoring of vital signs and clinical status 1
Severe Sepsis:
- Specific resuscitation targets to be achieved within 6 hours: 2
- Central venous pressure 8-12 mmHg
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg
- Urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h
- Central venous oxygen saturation ≥70% or mixed venous oxygen saturation ≥65%
- Normalization of lactate if initially elevated
- Early vasopressor therapy (norepinephrine as first-line) for persistent hypotension 2, 1, 3
- More intensive monitoring of lactate clearance, urine output, mental status, and capillary refill time 1
Additional Interventions for Severe Sepsis
- Consider steroids (hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone) for refractory septic shock 3
- More stringent glycemic control with target upper blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL 1
- DVT and stress ulcer prophylaxis 1
- Consider mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes if respiratory dysfunction present 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Delayed Recognition and Treatment: Each hour delay in antibiotic administration is associated with a 7.6% decrease in survival for severe sepsis 1. The risk of progression from severe sepsis to septic shock increases 8% for each hour before antibiotics are started 4.
Inadequate Fluid Resuscitation: Insufficient fluid resuscitation can worsen organ perfusion, particularly in severe sepsis 1.
Inappropriate De-escalation: Failure to narrow antimicrobial therapy once culture results are available (typically within 48-72 hours) can lead to antimicrobial resistance 1.
Overlooking Source Control: Inadequate source control (drainage of abscesses, removal of infected devices) can lead to persistent infection despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy 1.
Overreliance on Single Parameters: Using only one parameter (e.g., blood pressure) rather than a comprehensive assessment of perfusion can lead to inadequate resuscitation, especially in severe sepsis 1.
By recognizing these key differences in management approaches between regular sepsis and severe sepsis, clinicians can implement appropriate interventions based on disease severity, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality.