Meniscectomy versus Meniscal Repair: Decision-Making Algorithm
Meniscal repair should be prioritized over meniscectomy whenever possible due to better long-term patient outcomes, improved activity levels, and lower rates of osteoarthritis development. 1
Factors Favoring Meniscal Repair
Tear Characteristics
- Location: Tears in the peripheral/vascular "red zone" or "red-white zone" (outer 1/3 to middle 1/3)
- Type: Vertical longitudinal tears (especially in vascularized zones) 2
- Length: Any length can be considered (even longer tears previously thought irreparable) 3
- Timing: Acute tears (repair should be performed as early as possible) 3
- Special cases:
Patient Factors
- Younger patients (higher healing potential)
- Active lifestyle
- No or minimal osteoarthritis
- Stable knee or concomitant ACL reconstruction
Factors Favoring Meniscectomy
- Location: Tears in the avascular "white zone" (inner 1/3)
- Type: Complex, degenerative, or severely fragmented tears
- Tissue quality: Poor quality meniscal tissue that cannot hold sutures
- Chronicity: Long-standing degenerative tears in older patients
- Associated conditions: Advanced osteoarthritis
- Special case: Parameniscal cysts with horizontal cleavage tears (partial meniscectomy with cyst decompression) 5
Evidence-Based Decision Algorithm
First assessment: Determine if tear is traumatic or degenerative
For traumatic tears:
For degenerative tears:
Special considerations:
Clinical Outcomes and Evidence Quality
The evidence strongly supports meniscal repair over meniscectomy when possible. A review of observational studies showed that meniscal repairs have:
- Better long-term patient-reported outcome measures
- Better activity levels
- Lower failure rates compared to meniscectomy 1
However, it's important to note that the overall quality of evidence for meniscal procedures is relatively low. Of the studies examining meniscal treatments, most received grades of C (low level of scientific support) or D (expert opinion) 3.
Surgical Technique Considerations
- Repair techniques include "inside-out," "outside-in," and "all-inside" approaches 4
- Success rates: Outside-in technique shows approximately 74% success rate at 3.5 years follow-up 6
- Biological augmentation (bone marrow stimulation, fibrin clot, PRP) may expand indications for repair, though evidence for enhancement techniques is still limited 4, 3
Pitfalls and Caveats
Higher reoperation rates: While meniscal repair has better long-term outcomes, it does have higher reoperation rates compared to meniscectomy 4
Timing matters: Delayed repair may reduce healing potential; surgery should be performed as early as possible when repair is indicated 3
ACL deficiency: While stable ACL-deficient knees can have good meniscal repair outcomes without ACL reconstruction, individual factors like age and activity level must be considered 6
Conservative approach for degenerative tears: For middle-aged or elderly patients with degenerative meniscal lesions, non-operative treatment should be first-line, with arthroscopic meniscectomy reserved for treatment failures 2