What is a normal peak pulmonary artery pressure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Peak Pulmonary Artery Pressure

The normal peak (systolic) pulmonary artery pressure ranges from approximately 15-30 mmHg, with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure at rest of 14 ± 3 mmHg and an upper limit of normal of approximately 20 mmHg. 1

Normal Pulmonary Pressure Values

Pulmonary arterial pressure has several components that are important to understand:

  • Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP): 14 ± 3 mmHg at rest 1, 2
  • Upper limit of normal for mPAP: approximately 20 mmHg 1
  • Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP): ≤15 mmHg in normal individuals 1

Diagnostic Thresholds for Pulmonary Hypertension

It's important to distinguish between normal values and diagnostic thresholds for pulmonary hypertension:

  • Pulmonary Hypertension Definition: mPAP ≥25 mmHg at rest as assessed by right heart catheterization 3, 1, 4
  • Borderline Values: mPAP between 21-24 mmHg are of uncertain clinical significance but warrant close follow-up, especially in patients at risk for developing pulmonary arterial hypertension 1

Measurement Considerations

  • Gold Standard: Right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for accurate measurement of pulmonary pressures 1, 5
  • Standardization: Proper measurement requires standardization, including uniformity of the pressure transducer zero level at the midthoracic line 5
  • Non-invasive Assessment: Echocardiography can provide estimates of pulmonary artery pressure but has limitations compared to direct measurement 6

Age-Related Considerations

  • Normal values of pulmonary artery pressure during exercise are influenced by age 7
  • In individuals younger than 50 years, mPAP increases in parallel with cardiac output during exercise
  • In those 50 years and older, the increase in mPAP during exercise is steeper, likely due to diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle 7

Clinical Implications

  • The conventional definition of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) used in clinical studies includes an mPAP >25 mm Hg at rest with a normal pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units 3
  • When interpreting pulmonary pressure values, it's essential to consider the clinical context, including the presence of left heart disease, lung disease, and other potential causes of pulmonary hypertension 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying solely on echocardiography for definitive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension
  • Failing to consider age-related changes in normal pulmonary pressures, especially during exercise
  • Not distinguishing between pulmonary hypertension (PH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), which are not synonymous terms 3
  • Overlooking the importance of proper zeroing of pressure transducers during catheterization, which can lead to measurement errors

Remember that while non-invasive methods like echocardiography are useful screening tools, right heart catheterization remains essential for accurate measurement of pulmonary artery pressures and definitive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

References

Guideline

Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[Resting and exercise hemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension].

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 2011

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013

Research

Assessment of pulmonary artery pressure by echocardiography-A comprehensive review.

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.