What is the significance and management of a Von Willebrand factor (VWF) level of 36%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Significance and Management of Von Willebrand Factor Level of 36%

A von Willebrand factor (VWF) level of 36% indicates low VWF, which falls between normal levels and definite von Willebrand disease (VWD), and requires clinical management based on bleeding history and risk assessment. 1

Classification and Diagnosis

VWF levels of 36% fall into a specific diagnostic category:

  • This level is above the definitive cutoff for Type 1 VWD (<30 IU/dL or 30%) but below normal range (50-200 IU/dL) 1
  • Classified as "low VWF" (30-50 IU/dL) rather than definite VWD 2
  • This intermediate category has variable bleeding phenotypes and often lacks detectable VWF gene mutations 3

Additional Testing Needed

  • VWF:RCo (ristocetin cofactor activity) to assess VWF function
  • VWF:Ag (antigen) to quantify VWF protein
  • FVIII level, as VWF is a carrier protein for FVIII
  • VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio to distinguish between quantitative and qualitative defects (ratio >0.5-0.7 suggests quantitative deficiency) 1

Clinical Significance

The clinical significance of VWF level 36% depends on:

  1. Bleeding History:

    • Presence of mucocutaneous bleeding (epistaxis, easy bruising, gingival bleeding)
    • Prolonged bleeding from minor wounds
    • Heavy menstrual bleeding in women
    • Post-surgical bleeding episodes 4
  2. Family History:

    • Family members with diagnosed bleeding disorders
    • Family history of excessive bleeding with procedures 1
  3. Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT):

    • A structured assessment of bleeding symptoms should be performed
    • However, BAT should not be the sole determinant for ordering further testing 1

Management Approach

For Minor Procedures/Surgeries:

  • First-line prophylaxis: Tranexamic acid (antifibrinolytic) 1
  • If bleeding occurs: Consider DDAVP (desmopressin) 1

For Major Surgeries:

  • Prophylaxis: Combination of tranexamic acid and DDAVP 1
  • If bleeding occurs: Consider platelets, fresh frozen plasma, or other blood products based on clinical response 1

For Women with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding:

  • Check ferritin levels (iron deficiency is common) 1
  • Consider hormonal therapies (combined oral contraceptives)
  • Tranexamic acid during menstruation 1

For Pregnancy/Delivery:

  • Prophylactic tranexamic acid is recommended (used by 58% of clinicians) 1
  • DDAVP may be added if needed (used by 9% of clinicians in combination with antifibrinolytics) 1

Important Considerations

  • Medication Interactions: Avoid medications that impair platelet function (NSAIDs, aspirin) 1
  • Antidepressants: If needed, bupropion is considered safer than SSRIs, which can increase bleeding risk 4
  • ABO Blood Group: May influence VWF levels but blood group-specific reference ranges are not recommended for diagnosis 1
  • Repeat Testing: VWF levels can fluctuate with stress, exercise, pregnancy, and inflammation, so repeat testing may be necessary 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Misclassification: Don't automatically classify as "normal" since 36% is below normal range but above definitive VWD cutoff 5
  2. Ignoring Clinical History: Bleeding history is crucial for management decisions, regardless of VWF level 5
  3. Sample Handling: Improper processing can affect results; samples should be processed promptly at room temperature and frozen at -40°C if not tested within 2 hours 1
  4. Overlooking Iron Deficiency: Check ferritin levels, as iron deficiency is common in patients with low VWF 1
  5. Assuming No Risk: Even with borderline levels, patients may have significant bleeding with surgery or trauma 3

This level requires clinical correlation and potentially prophylactic management for invasive procedures, even though it doesn't meet the strict criteria for definitive VWD.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Patients with Low von Willebrand Factor

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Clinical significance of slightly reduced von Willebrand factor activity.

Polish archives of internal medicine, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.