At what fracture risk assessment (FRAX) score should treatment for osteoporosis be initiated?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

When to Start Treatment for Osteoporosis Based on FRAX

Treatment for osteoporosis should be initiated when the FRAX 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture is ≥20% or hip fracture risk is ≥3%, or in patients with prior osteoporotic fractures regardless of FRAX score. 1

Fracture Risk Categories and Treatment Thresholds

The decision to initiate osteoporosis treatment should be based on absolute fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool, which incorporates clinical risk factors with or without BMD measurements.

Adults ≥40 Years of Age:

  • High Fracture Risk (requires treatment):

    • Prior osteoporotic fracture(s)
    • BMD T-score ≤-2.5
    • FRAX 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20%
    • FRAX 10-year risk of hip fracture ≥3% 2, 1
  • Very High Fracture Risk (requires treatment, preferably with anabolic agents):

    • Prior osteoporotic fracture(s)
    • BMD T-score ≤-3.5
    • FRAX 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥30%
    • FRAX 10-year risk of hip fracture ≥4.5% 2, 1
  • Moderate Fracture Risk (consider treatment):

    • FRAX 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture 10-19%
    • FRAX 10-year risk of hip fracture >1% and <3% 2
  • Low Fracture Risk (generally no pharmacologic treatment):

    • FRAX 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture <10%
    • FRAX 10-year risk of hip fracture ≤1% 2

Special Considerations for Glucocorticoid Users:

For patients on glucocorticoids, the fracture risk is higher, and FRAX adjustments are needed:

  • For doses >7.5 mg/day, multiply the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture by 1.15 and hip fracture by 1.2 2
  • Example: If hip fracture risk is 2.0%, adjusted risk would be 2.4% 2

Clinical Implementation of FRAX for Treatment Decisions

  1. Calculate FRAX score using country-specific tools (available at https://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.jsp)
  2. Adjust FRAX score if patient is on glucocorticoids >7.5 mg/day
  3. Determine risk category based on FRAX results and presence of prior fractures
  4. Initiate treatment if patient meets high-risk criteria

Important Clinical Considerations:

  • BMD measurement is valuable but not always necessary for treatment decisions. Studies show 83.8% concordance between FRAX calculations with and without BMD 3.

  • Discordance between FRAX with and without BMD is more common in elderly patients, those with lower BMD, and those with FRAX scores near intervention thresholds 3.

  • Most patients designated as high risk by FRAX (with femoral neck BMD) have T-scores in the osteoporotic range at one or more measurement sites (83-85% for major osteoporotic fracture risk; 64-66% for hip fracture risk) 4.

  • Very few high-risk patients (<1%) have normal T-scores at all measurement sites 4.

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. FRAX is validated only for untreated patients aged 40-90 years 5. Do not use FRAX to assess fracture risk in patients already on osteoporosis treatment.

  2. FRAX does not account for dose-response relationships for several risk factors (e.g., alcohol, smoking, glucocorticoids) beyond binary yes/no inputs 6.

  3. FRAX does not include falls history, which is an important independent risk factor. Use clinical judgment to adjust treatment decisions in patients with frequent falls 5.

  4. FRAX may underestimate fracture risk in patients with:

    • Multiple prior fractures (FRAX only accounts for presence/absence of fracture)
    • Recent fractures (higher imminent risk)
    • Very low BMD (T-score < -3.5)
    • High-dose or long-term glucocorticoid use 2
  5. Country-specific FRAX tools should be used whenever possible, as fracture rates vary significantly between countries 7.

By using FRAX to guide treatment decisions, clinicians can direct osteoporosis therapies to those at highest risk of fracture, improving outcomes related to morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

References

Guideline

Osteoporosis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012

Research

Assessment of fracture risk with FRAX and FRAXplus.

Gaceta medica de Mexico, 2024

Research

Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.