What is the significance of the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment) score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Significance of FRAX Score in Osteoporosis Management

The FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment) score is a critical clinical tool that provides an individualized 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures, allowing clinicians to make evidence-based treatment decisions based on absolute fracture risk rather than BMD alone. 1

What is the FRAX Score?

FRAX is a computer-based algorithm developed by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases that calculates fracture probability from easily obtainable clinical risk factors in men and women. 2

The FRAX calculation incorporates:

  • Demographic factors: age, sex, weight, height (BMI), race/ethnicity
  • Clinical risk factors:
    • Previous fragility fracture
    • Parental history of hip fracture
    • Current smoking status
    • Long-term use of oral glucocorticoids
    • Rheumatoid arthritis
    • Secondary osteoporosis
    • Excessive alcohol consumption
  • Optional: Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-score 2, 1

Clinical Importance and Application

FRAX addresses a critical limitation of BMD testing alone - while BMD is specific for fracture risk, it lacks sensitivity. Most fractures occur in people with BMD above the osteoporosis threshold (T-score > -2.5) simply because there are more people in this population. 2

Key applications include:

  • Risk stratification: FRAX provides a more comprehensive assessment of fracture risk than BMD alone by incorporating clinical risk factors that are partly independent of BMD 1

  • Treatment decision guidance: The output helps determine which patients would benefit from pharmacologic intervention, especially those with osteopenia (T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5) 2

  • Country-specific calculations: FRAX models are calibrated for different countries and ethnic groups, accounting for geographic variations in fracture incidence 2, 1

Interpretation of FRAX Results

The FRAX score is expressed as a percentage representing:

  1. 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (hip, clinical spine, humerus, or wrist)
  2. 10-year probability of hip fracture specifically 1

Treatment thresholds vary by country and guidelines, but generally:

  • The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends treatment for patients with:

    • 10-year probability of hip fracture ≥3% OR
    • 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% 2, 1
  • These thresholds apply to patients with osteopenia (T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5); patients with osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) generally warrant treatment regardless of FRAX score 2

Special Considerations and Limitations

Glucocorticoid Adjustment

For patients on glucocorticoids at doses >7.5 mg/day of prednisone, FRAX underestimates risk. The calculated risk should be increased by:

  • 15% for major osteoporotic fracture
  • 20% for hip fracture 1

Important Limitations

  • Not validated for adults under 40 years 1
  • Does not account for:
    • Dose-response relationships for risk factors (e.g., smoking amount)
    • Falls history or frailty
    • Lumbar spine BMD
    • Trabecular bone score 1
    • Quantification of glucocorticoid exposure (only yes/no) 1

Clinical Pearls

  • FRAX with BMD is more accurate than FRAX alone or BMD alone 1, 3
  • For women age 65+ with no risk factors, the baseline 10-year risk for any osteoporotic fracture is approximately 9.3% 2, 1
  • For women age 70+ with a parent history of hip fracture, 99% of FRAX combinations exceed treatment thresholds 4
  • For women 65+ with a previous fracture, 98% of FRAX combinations exceed treatment thresholds regardless of T-score 4

Evidence Quality and Implementation

Research shows FRAX provides incremental improvement in fracture prediction compared to simplified risk assessment tools. Only 36 individuals need to be assessed using FRAX instead of simpler tools to yield an improvement in prediction 5.

FRAX has been incorporated into more than 80 guidelines worldwide and is increasingly integrated into DXA software and electronic health record systems 1, 6. The website receives approximately 3 million visits annually, demonstrating its widespread clinical adoption 6.

While FRAX should not be used to assess reduction in fracture risk in individuals already on treatment, it may still have value for guiding the need for continued treatment or treatment withdrawal 7.

References

Guideline

Osteoporosis Fracture Risk Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patients.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 2009

Research

Direct comparison of FRAX(R) and a simplified fracture risk assessment tool in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016

Research

FRAX Update.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 2017

Research

Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction?

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.