The EAT-26 (Eating Attitudes Test-26) Form
The EAT-26 is a standardized self-report screening tool used to identify individuals at risk for eating disorders by measuring symptoms and concerns characteristic of eating disorders. 1
Purpose and Development
The EAT-26 is an abbreviated version of the original 40-item Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-40), developed through factor analysis to provide a more economical assessment tool while maintaining high correlation (r = 0.98) with the original version. 1 It serves as an objective measure to identify individuals who may require further clinical evaluation for eating disorders.
Structure and Scoring
The EAT-26 consists of 26 questions that assess:
- Dieting behaviors
- Bulimia and food preoccupation
- Oral control
These three factors form subscales that relate to:
- Bulimic behaviors
- Weight concerns
- Body image issues
- Psychological symptoms associated with eating disorders 1
Scoring uses a 6-point Likert-type scale, with scores ≥20 traditionally indicating elevated risk for an eating disorder. However, optimal cut-off scores may vary by population:
- In Japan, a cut-off score of 17 has been identified as optimal with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.866 and 0.868, respectively 2
- For obese patients attending nutritional services, a lower cut-off of 11 has been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy 3
Clinical Applications
The EAT-26 is widely used in various settings:
Clinical screening: Helps identify individuals who may need comprehensive evaluation for eating disorders
Research: Used in epidemiological studies to assess prevalence of eating disorder risk
School-based screening: Employed in educational settings to identify adolescents at risk for eating disorders 4
Treatment monitoring: Can track changes in eating attitudes during treatment
Limitations and Considerations
Recent psychometric evaluation using Rasch analysis has identified several concerns with the EAT-26:
- The test appears biased toward detecting moderate to high levels of eating disorder risk but may not adequately identify those with low risk
- Seven items showed misfit in statistical analysis
- The six-category rating scale did not function optimally
- Five items functioned differently based on obesity status, though no items showed differential functioning based on sex 5
Integration with Comprehensive Assessment
The EAT-26 should be part of a broader assessment approach that includes:
- Medical evaluation including vital signs, height, weight, BMI assessment
- Laboratory tests (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel)
- Cardiac evaluation with ECG when indicated
- Psychological assessment for comorbidities 6
For a comprehensive nutritional assessment in patients with suspected eating disorders, the EAT-26 should be complemented with evaluation of:
- Current eating patterns
- Food restrictions and rules
- Compensatory behaviors
- Weight history
- Body image concerns
- Menstrual history in females
- Bone health 7
Clinical Significance
Early identification of eating disorders is crucial as they can lead to serious medical complications affecting multiple organ systems, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, metabolic, and hematologic systems. 6 The EAT-26 provides a valuable first-line screening tool that can facilitate timely intervention and potentially reduce morbidity and mortality associated with eating disorders.