What is the recommended protocol for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment for treatment-resistant depression?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Protocol for TMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression

For patients with treatment-resistant depression who have shown partial or no response to at least two adequate pharmacologic treatment trials, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is recommended as an effective treatment option. 1, 2

Standard TMS Protocol Parameters

  • Target Location: Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)
  • Frequency: 10 Hz (high-frequency)
  • Session Duration: 20-30 sessions total
  • Treatment Schedule: Daily sessions for 4-6 weeks
  • Stimulation Parameters:
    • 2000 pulses per session
    • Intensity at 110% of resting motor threshold

Evidence Base for Protocol

The 2022 VA/DoD clinical practice guideline strongly supports rTMS for treatment-resistant depression, with evidence showing:

  • Significantly higher response and remission rates compared to sham treatment 1
  • Number needed to treat of 3.4-9 patients for response and 5-7 patients for remission 1, 2
  • Minimal and manageable adverse events 1

Alternative Protocol Options

  1. Low-Frequency Right-Sided TMS (LFR-TMS):

    • Target: Right DLPFC
    • Frequency: 1 Hz
    • Duration: Shorter sessions (approximately 4 minutes vs 16 minutes for 10 Hz)
    • Evidence shows comparable efficacy to high-frequency left-sided TMS 3, 4
    • May be preferred due to shorter treatment time and potentially fewer side effects 3
  2. Bilateral TMS:

    • Combines high-frequency left DLPFC and low-frequency right DLPFC stimulation
    • May provide additional benefit for some patients 4
  3. Theta-Burst Stimulation (TBS):

    • Current evidence is insufficient to make a firm recommendation 1
    • Shows statistically significant improvement over sham at 12 weeks but not at 24 weeks 1
    • Requires further research to establish optimal parameters

Treatment Duration and Frequency

  • Minimum Duration: At least 4 weeks of treatment is necessary for clinically meaningful benefits 4
  • Session Frequency: Evidence suggests that the number of treatments is more important than spacing; 5 days/week for 4 weeks showed faster improvement than 3 days/week for 6 weeks (with similar total sessions) 5

Predictors of Response

  • Baseline psychomotor agitation may predict successful response to treatment 4
  • Brain imaging studies show that TMS treatment increases gray matter volume in regions including the left anterior cingulate cortex, left insula, left superior temporal gyrus, and right angular gyrus 6
  • Increases in anterior cingulate gray matter volume correlate with improvement in depression severity 6

Clinical Considerations and Challenges

  • Access to TMS can be challenging due to requirement for frequent onsite visits 1, 2
  • Insurance coverage may be a consideration for some patients 2
  • Patients should be informed that effects may not be apparent until after 2 weeks of treatment 3
  • Response rates are approximately 50-66% when used as an add-on to medication 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate Treatment Duration: Stopping treatment before 4 weeks may result in failure to achieve clinical benefit 4
  • Improper Coil Positioning: Accurate targeting of the DLPFC is essential for efficacy
  • Insufficient Intensity: Stimulation should be at 110% of motor threshold 5
  • Premature Conclusion of Inefficacy: Clinical improvement may not be evident until after 2 weeks of treatment 3

TMS represents an important non-pharmacological option for treatment-resistant depression with established efficacy and a favorable side effect profile compared to more invasive alternatives like ECT.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.