Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI)
Early recognition of CLTI and immediate referral to a vascular team are essential for limb salvage, with revascularization recommended as soon as possible to reduce mortality and amputation risk. 1
Diagnosis and Initial Assessment
CLTI is defined as peripheral artery disease (PAD) combined with:
- Rest pain
- Gangrene
- Lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration 2
Initial evaluation should include:
Revascularization Strategy
Decision-Making Framework
Patient Risk Assessment:
- Evaluate procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality risk 2
- Categorize as average-risk or high-risk
Limb Severity Assessment:
- Evaluate degree of tissue loss, infection, and ischemia
- More severe limb threat may favor surgical approach
Anatomic Complexity Assessment:
- Define preferred target artery path
- Estimate limb-based patency
- Classify into three stages of complexity 2
Vein Conduit Availability:
Specific Revascularization Recommendations
For patients with adequate great saphenous vein:
For patients without adequate saphenous vein:
For multilevel disease:
For femoro-popliteal lesions:
Post-Revascularization Care
Antithrombotic Therapy:
Follow-up Protocol:
Additional Management Considerations
Medical Therapy:
Wound Care:
Exercise Therapy:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Delayed Recognition and Referral:
Underestimation of Bleeding Risk:
- Bleeding risk assessment is often not standardized in antithrombotic management 5
Inconsistent Antithrombotic Protocols:
- Only 36% of centers have dedicated protocols for antithrombotic therapy after revascularization 5
- Practices vary widely across countries and specialties
Hub vs. Spoke Disparities:
- Patients treated at non-vascular hub centers may experience delays in care 7
The BEST-CLI trial provides the strongest evidence that surgical bypass with adequate autologous vein is superior to endovascular therapy for CLTI patients, while endovascular approaches are reasonable first-line options when adequate vein is unavailable 4.